Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
2ndspos(0, Z) → rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) → rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) → 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) → 0
times(s(X), Y) → plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) → times(X, X)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → ACTIVATE(Z)
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → ACTIVATE(Z)
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → ACTIVATE(Z)
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → ACTIVATE(Z)
PI(X) → 2NDSPOS(X, from(0))
PI(X) → FROM(0)
PLUS(s(X), Y) → PLUS(X, Y)
TIMES(s(X), Y) → PLUS(Y, times(X, Y))
TIMES(s(X), Y) → TIMES(X, Y)
SQUARE(X) → TIMES(X, X)
ACTIVATE(n__from(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
2ndspos(0, Z) → rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) → rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) → 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) → 0
times(s(X), Y) → plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) → times(X, X)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 9 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(s(X), Y) → PLUS(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
2ndspos(0, Z) → rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) → rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) → 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) → 0
times(s(X), Y) → plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) → times(X, X)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(s(X), Y) → PLUS(X, Y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2)  =  PLUS(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
from(x1)  =  from(x1)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
n__from(x1)  =  x1
2ndspos(x1, x2)  =  x1
0  =  0
rnil  =  rnil
cons2(x1, x2)  =  cons2(x1, x2)
activate(x1)  =  activate(x1)
rcons(x1, x2)  =  rcons(x1, x2)
posrecip(x1)  =  posrecip
2ndsneg(x1, x2)  =  2ndsneg(x1)
negrecip(x1)  =  negrecip
pi(x1)  =  x1
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
times(x1, x2)  =  times(x1, x2)
square(x1)  =  square(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Precedence:

cons2₂ > rcons₂ > cons₂
cons2₂ > posrecip > cons₂
cons2₂ > 2ndsneg₁ > cons₂
cons2₂ > negrecip > cons₂
activate₁ > from₁ > s₁ > PLUS₂ > cons₂
activate₁ > from₁ > s₁ > rcons₂ > cons₂
activate₁ > from₁ > s₁ > posrecip > cons₂
activate₁ > from₁ > s₁ > 2ndsneg₁ > cons₂
activate₁ > from₁ > s₁ > negrecip > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > 0 > rnil > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > plus₂ > s₁ > PLUS₂ > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > plus₂ > s₁ > rcons₂ > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > plus₂ > s₁ > posrecip > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > plus₂ > s₁ > 2ndsneg₁ > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > plus₂ > s₁ > negrecip > cons₂

Status:

PLUS₂: [2,1]
s₁: multiset
from₁: multiset
cons₂: multiset
0: multiset
rnil: multiset
cons2₂: multiset
activate₁: multiset
rcons₂: multiset
posrecip: multiset
2ndsneg₁: [1]
negrecip: multiset
plus₂: [1,2]
times₂: [1,2]
square₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
2ndspos(0, Z) → rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) → rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) → 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) → 0
times(s(X), Y) → plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) → times(X, X)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
2ndspos(0, Z) → rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) → rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) → 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) → 0
times(s(X), Y) → plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) → times(X, X)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TIMES(s(X), Y) → TIMES(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
2ndspos(0, Z) → rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) → rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) → 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) → 0
times(s(X), Y) → plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) → times(X, X)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TIMES(s(X), Y) → TIMES(X, Y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
TIMES(x1, x2)  =  TIMES(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
from(x1)  =  from(x1)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
n__from(x1)  =  x1
2ndspos(x1, x2)  =  x1
0  =  0
rnil  =  rnil
cons2(x1, x2)  =  cons2(x1, x2)
activate(x1)  =  activate(x1)
rcons(x1, x2)  =  rcons(x1, x2)
posrecip(x1)  =  posrecip
2ndsneg(x1, x2)  =  2ndsneg(x1)
negrecip(x1)  =  negrecip
pi(x1)  =  x1
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
times(x1, x2)  =  times(x1, x2)
square(x1)  =  square(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Precedence:

cons2₂ > rcons₂ > cons₂
cons2₂ > posrecip > cons₂
cons2₂ > 2ndsneg₁ > cons₂
cons2₂ > negrecip > cons₂
activate₁ > from₁ > s₁ > TIMES₂ > cons₂
activate₁ > from₁ > s₁ > rcons₂ > cons₂
activate₁ > from₁ > s₁ > posrecip > cons₂
activate₁ > from₁ > s₁ > 2ndsneg₁ > cons₂
activate₁ > from₁ > s₁ > negrecip > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > 0 > rnil > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > plus₂ > s₁ > TIMES₂ > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > plus₂ > s₁ > rcons₂ > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > plus₂ > s₁ > posrecip > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > plus₂ > s₁ > 2ndsneg₁ > cons₂
square₁ > times₂ > plus₂ > s₁ > negrecip > cons₂

Status:

TIMES₂: [2,1]
s₁: multiset
from₁: multiset
cons₂: multiset
0: multiset
rnil: multiset
cons2₂: multiset
activate₁: multiset
rcons₂: multiset
posrecip: multiset
2ndsneg₁: [1]
negrecip: multiset
plus₂: [1,2]
times₂: [1,2]
square₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
2ndspos(0, Z) → rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) → rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) → 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) → 0
times(s(X), Y) → plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) → times(X, X)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
2ndspos(0, Z) → rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) → rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) → 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) → 0
times(s(X), Y) → plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) → times(X, X)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
2ndspos(0, Z) → rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) → rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) → 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) → 0
times(s(X), Y) → plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) → times(X, X)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
2NDSPOS(x1, x2)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
cons2(x1, x2)  =  x2
cons(x1, x2)  =  x1
2NDSNEG(x1, x2)  =  x1
activate(x1)  =  activate(x1)
from(x1)  =  from(x1)
n__from(x1)  =  n__from(x1)
2ndspos(x1, x2)  =  2ndspos
0  =  0
rnil  =  rnil
rcons(x1, x2)  =  x1
posrecip(x1)  =  posrecip
2ndsneg(x1, x2)  =  2ndsneg
negrecip(x1)  =  negrecip
pi(x1)  =  pi(x1)
plus(x1, x2)  =  plus(x1, x2)
times(x1, x2)  =  times(x1, x2)
square(x1)  =  square(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Precedence:

activate₁ > from₁ > s₁ > negrecip
activate₁ > from₁ > n_from1
pi₁ > from₁ > s₁ > negrecip
pi₁ > from₁ > n_from1
pi₁ > 2ndspos > posrecip
pi₁ > 2ndspos > 2ndsneg > s₁ > negrecip
pi₁ > 2ndspos > 2ndsneg > rnil
pi₁ > 0
square₁ > times₂ > 0
square₁ > times₂ > plus₂ > s₁ > negrecip

Status:

s₁: [1]
activate₁: multiset
from₁: multiset
n_from1: multiset
2ndspos: []
0: multiset
rnil: multiset
posrecip: multiset
2ndsneg: []
negrecip: multiset
pi₁: multiset
plus₂: [1,2]
times₂: multiset
square₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
2ndspos(0, Z) → rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) → rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) → 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) → 0
times(s(X), Y) → plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) → times(X, X)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
2ndspos(0, Z) → rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) → rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) → 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) → rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) → 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) → Y
plus(s(X), Y) → s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) → 0
times(s(X), Y) → plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) → times(X, X)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(19) TRUE