Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmph3BEwE/Ex1_GM03

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could not be shown:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

  ↳5 QDP

    ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳7 QDP

    ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳9 QDP

    ↳10 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳11 QDP

    ↳12 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳13 QDP

    ↳14 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳15 TRUE

  ↳16 QDP

    ↳17 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳18 QDP

    ↳19 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳20 QDP

    ↳21 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳22 QDP

    ↳23 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳24 QDP

    ↳25 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳26 QDP

    ↳27 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳28 QDP

    ↳29 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳30 TRUE

  ↳31 QDP

    ↳32 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳33 QDP

    ↳34 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳35 QDP

    ↳36 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳37 QDP

    ↳38 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳39 QDP

    ↳40 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳41 TRUE

  ↳42 QDP

    ↳43 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳44 QDP

    ↳45 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳46 QDP

    ↳47 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳48 TRUE

  ↳49 QDP

    ↳50 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳51 QDP

    ↳52 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳53 QDP

    ↳54 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳55 TRUE

  ↳56 QDP

    ↳57 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳58 QDP

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(p(0)) → MARK(0)
ACTIVE(p(s(X))) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(leq(0, Y)) → MARK(true)
ACTIVE(leq(s(X), 0)) → MARK(false)
ACTIVE(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(leq(X, Y))
ACTIVE(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → LEQ(X, Y)
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(diff(X, Y)) → MARK(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
ACTIVE(diff(X, Y)) → IF(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y)))
ACTIVE(diff(X, Y)) → LEQ(X, Y)
ACTIVE(diff(X, Y)) → S(diff(p(X), Y))
ACTIVE(diff(X, Y)) → DIFF(p(X), Y)
ACTIVE(diff(X, Y)) → P(X)
MARK(p(X)) → ACTIVE(p(mark(X)))
MARK(p(X)) → P(mark(X))
MARK(p(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(leq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(leq(X1, X2)) → LEQ(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(leq(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(leq(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(true) → ACTIVE(true)
MARK(false) → ACTIVE(false)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(diff(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(diff(X1, X2)) → DIFF(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(diff(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(diff(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
P(mark(X)) → P(X)
P(active(X)) → P(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
LEQ(mark(X1), X2) → LEQ(X1, X2)
LEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → LEQ(X1, X2)
LEQ(active(X1), X2) → LEQ(X1, X2)
LEQ(X1, active(X2)) → LEQ(X1, X2)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
DIFF(mark(X1), X2) → DIFF(X1, X2)
DIFF(X1, mark(X2)) → DIFF(X1, X2)
DIFF(active(X1), X2) → DIFF(X1, X2)
DIFF(X1, active(X2)) → DIFF(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 6 SCCs with 17 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIFF(X1, mark(X2)) → DIFF(X1, X2)
DIFF(mark(X1), X2) → DIFF(X1, X2)
DIFF(active(X1), X2) → DIFF(X1, X2)
DIFF(X1, active(X2)) → DIFF(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

DIFF(X1, active(X2)) → DIFF(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
DIFF(x1, x2) = x2
mark(x1) = x1
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIFF(X1, mark(X2)) → DIFF(X1, X2)
DIFF(mark(X1), X2) → DIFF(X1, X2)
DIFF(active(X1), X2) → DIFF(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

DIFF(X1, mark(X2)) → DIFF(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
DIFF(x1, x2) = DIFF(x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = active

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

active: multiset
DIFF₁: [1]
mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIFF(mark(X1), X2) → DIFF(X1, X2)
DIFF(active(X1), X2) → DIFF(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

DIFF(mark(X1), X2) → DIFF(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
DIFF(x1, x2) = DIFF(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[DIFF₂, mark₁]

Status:

DIFF₂: [2,1]
mark₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIFF(active(X1), X2) → DIFF(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

DIFF(active(X1), X2) → DIFF(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

DIFF₂: [1,2]
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(13) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(14) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(15) TRUE

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
IF(x1, x2, x3) = IF(x3)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[IF₁, mark₁]

Status:

mark₁: multiset
IF₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
IF(x1, x2, x3) = IF(x2, x3)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

mark₁ > IF₂

Status:

mark₁: [1]
IF₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
IF(x1, x2, x3) = IF(x1, x2, x3)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[IF₃, mark₁]

Status:

mark₁: [1]
IF₃: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
IF(x1, x2, x3) = IF(x3)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[IF₁, active₁]

Status:

active₁: multiset
IF₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(24) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(25) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
IF(x1, x2, x3) = IF(x1, x3)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[IF₂, active₁]

Status:

active₁: multiset
IF₂: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(26) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(27) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
IF(x1, x2, x3) = IF(x2, x3)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[IF₂, active₁]

Status:

active₁: multiset
IF₂: [1,2]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(28) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(29) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(30) TRUE

(31) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → LEQ(X1, X2)
LEQ(mark(X1), X2) → LEQ(X1, X2)
LEQ(active(X1), X2) → LEQ(X1, X2)
LEQ(X1, active(X2)) → LEQ(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(32) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LEQ(X1, active(X2)) → LEQ(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LEQ(x1, x2) = x2
mark(x1) = x1
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(33) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → LEQ(X1, X2)
LEQ(mark(X1), X2) → LEQ(X1, X2)
LEQ(active(X1), X2) → LEQ(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(34) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → LEQ(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LEQ(x1, x2) = LEQ(x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = active

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

active: multiset
LEQ₁: [1]
mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(35) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LEQ(mark(X1), X2) → LEQ(X1, X2)
LEQ(active(X1), X2) → LEQ(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(36) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LEQ(mark(X1), X2) → LEQ(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LEQ(x1, x2) = LEQ(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[LEQ₂, mark₁]

Status:

mark₁: multiset
LEQ₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(37) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LEQ(active(X1), X2) → LEQ(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(38) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LEQ(active(X1), X2) → LEQ(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

active₁: [1]
LEQ₂: [1,2]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(39) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(40) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(41) TRUE

(42) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(43) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(active(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = S(x1)
active(x1) = active(x1)
mark(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[S₁, active₁]

Status:

active₁: multiset
S₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(44) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(45) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

mark₁ > S₁

Status:

mark₁: multiset
S₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(46) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(47) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(48) TRUE

(49) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

P(active(X)) → P(X)
P(mark(X)) → P(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(50) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

P(active(X)) → P(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
P(x1) = P(x1)
active(x1) = active(x1)
mark(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[P₁, active₁]

Status:

active₁: multiset
P₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(51) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

P(mark(X)) → P(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(52) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

P(mark(X)) → P(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

mark₁ > P₁

Status:

P₁: multiset
mark₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(53) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(54) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(55) TRUE

(56) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(p(s(X))) → MARK(X)
MARK(p(X)) → ACTIVE(p(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(leq(X, Y))
MARK(p(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(leq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(leq(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(leq(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(diff(X, Y)) → MARK(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(diff(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(diff(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(diff(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(57) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1) = x1
p(x1) = p
s(x1) = s
MARK(x1) = MARK
mark(x1) = mark
leq(x1, x2) = leq
if(x1, x2, x3) = if
true = true
false = false
diff(x1, x2) = diff
0 = 0
active(x1) = active

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

0 > mark > [p, MARK, leq, if, diff] > s > active > false
0 > mark > [p, MARK, leq, if, diff] > true > active > false

Status:

active: []
MARK: []
p: []
diff: []
if: []
true: multiset
mark: []
false: multiset
s: multiset
leq: []
0: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

p(active(X)) → p(X)
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)

(58) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(p(s(X))) → MARK(X)
MARK(p(X)) → ACTIVE(p(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(leq(X, Y))
MARK(p(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(leq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(leq(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(leq(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(diff(X, Y)) → MARK(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(diff(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(diff(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(diff(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(p(0)) → mark(0)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(leq(0, Y)) → mark(true)
active(leq(s(X), 0)) → mark(false)
active(leq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(leq(X, Y))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(diff(X, Y)) → mark(if(leq(X, Y), 0, s(diff(p(X), Y))))
mark(p(X)) → active(p(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(leq(X1, X2)) → active(leq(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(diff(X1, X2)) → active(diff(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
p(mark(X)) → p(X)
p(active(X)) → p(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
leq(mark(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, mark(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(active(X1), X2) → leq(X1, X2)
leq(X1, active(X2)) → leq(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
diff(mark(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, mark(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(active(X1), X2) → diff(X1, X2)
diff(X1, active(X2)) → diff(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.