Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
  ↳5 QDP
    ↳6 UsableRulesProof (⇔)
    ↳7 QDP
    ↳8 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
    ↳9 TRUE
  ↳10 QDP
    ↳11 UsableRulesProof (⇔)
    ↳12 QDP
    ↳13 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
    ↳14 TRUE
  ↳15 QDP
    ↳16 UsableRulesProof (⇔)
    ↳17 QDP
    ↳18 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
    ↳19 TRUE
  ↳20 QDP
    ↳21 UsableRulesProof (⇔)
    ↳22 QDP
    ↳23 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
    ↳24 TRUE
  ↳25 QDP
    ↳26 UsableRulesProof (⇔)
    ↳27 QDP
    ↳28 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
    ↳29 TRUE
  ↳30 QDP
    ↳31 UsableRulesProof (⇔)
    ↳32 QDP
    ↳33 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔)
    ↳34 TRUE
  ↳35 QDP
    ↳36 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳37 QDP
    ↳38 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳39 QDP
    ↳40 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳41 QDP
    ↳42 UsableRulesProof (⇔)
    ↳43 QDP
    ↳44 UsableRulesReductionPairsProof (⇔)
    ↳45 QDP
    ↳46 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
    ↳47 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(eq(0, 0)) → MARK(true)
ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → EQ(X, Y)
ACTIVE(eq(X, Y)) → MARK(false)
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → MARK(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → CONS(X, inf(s(X)))
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → INF(s(X))
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(take(0, X)) → MARK(nil)
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → MARK(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → CONS(Y, take(X, L))
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → TAKE(X, L)
ACTIVE(length(nil)) → MARK(0)
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → MARK(s(length(L)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → S(length(L))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → LENGTH(L)
MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(true) → ACTIVE(true)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(false) → ACTIVE(false)
MARK(inf(X)) → ACTIVE(inf(mark(X)))
MARK(inf(X)) → INF(mark(X))
MARK(inf(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
MARK(length(X)) → LENGTH(mark(X))
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)
EQ(mark(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(X1, mark(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(active(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(X1, active(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
INF(mark(X)) → INF(X)
INF(active(X)) → INF(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 7 SCCs with 19 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(19) TRUE

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

INF(active(X)) → INF(X)
INF(mark(X)) → INF(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

INF(active(X)) → INF(X)
INF(mark(X)) → INF(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • INF(active(X)) → INF(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • INF(mark(X)) → INF(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(24) TRUE

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • S(active(X)) → S(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • S(mark(X)) → S(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(29) TRUE

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(X1, mark(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(mark(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(active(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(X1, active(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(X1, mark(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(mark(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(active(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(X1, active(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • EQ(X1, mark(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • EQ(mark(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • EQ(active(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • EQ(X1, active(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(34) TRUE

(35) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → MARK(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → MARK(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
MARK(inf(X)) → ACTIVE(inf(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → MARK(s(length(L)))
MARK(inf(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(36) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = 0   
POL(MARK(x1)) = x1   
POL(active(x1)) = 0   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(eq(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(inf(x1)) = x1   
POL(length(x1)) = x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 0   
POL(nil) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   
POL(true) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)

(37) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → MARK(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → MARK(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
MARK(inf(X)) → ACTIVE(inf(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → MARK(s(length(L)))
MARK(inf(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(38) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(inf(X)) → ACTIVE(inf(mark(X)))
MARK(inf(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = 1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(active(x1)) = 0   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(eq(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(inf(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(length(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 0   
POL(nil) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(true) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)

(39) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → MARK(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → MARK(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → MARK(s(length(L)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(40) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(inf(X)) → MARK(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = x1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 0   
POL(active(x1)) = x1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(eq(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(inf(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(length(x1)) = x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = x1   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)

(41) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → MARK(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → MARK(s(length(L)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(42) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(43) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → MARK(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → MARK(s(length(L)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(44) UsableRulesReductionPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with a polynomial ordering [POLO], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [FROCOS05] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.

The following dependency pairs can be deleted:

ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → MARK(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → MARK(s(length(L)))
The following rules are removed from R:

cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = x1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = x1   
POL(active(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 2 + x1 + 2·x2   
POL(eq(x1, x2)) = 1 + 2·x1 + x2   
POL(length(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(s(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   

(45) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(46) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

(47) TRUE