(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
2nd(cons(X, n__cons(Y, Z))) → activate(Y)
from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
cons(X1, X2) → n__cons(X1, X2)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__cons(X1, X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Used ordering:
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Precedence:
2nd1 > activate1 > from1 > cons2 > ncons2
2nd1 > activate1 > from1 > nfrom1 > ncons2
2nd1 > activate1 > from1 > s1 > ncons2
Status:
from1: [1]
cons2: [1,2]
nfrom1: [1]
2nd1: [1]
ncons2: [1,2]
s1: [1]
activate1: [1]
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:
2nd(cons(X, n__cons(Y, Z))) → activate(Y)
from(X) → cons(X, n__from(s(X)))
cons(X1, X2) → n__cons(X1, X2)
from(X) → n__from(X)
activate(n__cons(X1, X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(X)
activate(X) → X
(2) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.
(3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.
(4) TRUE