Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpr95vt7/Ex14_AEGL02

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could not be shown:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

  ↳5 QDP

    ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳7 QDP

    ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳9 QDP

    ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳11 TRUE

  ↳12 QDP

    ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳14 QDP

    ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳16 QDP

    ↳17 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳18 TRUE

  ↳19 QDP

    ↳20 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳21 QDP

    ↳22 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳23 QDP

    ↳24 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳25 TRUE

  ↳26 QDP

    ↳27 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳28 QDP

    ↳29 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳30 QDP

    ↳31 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳32 TRUE

  ↳33 QDP

    ↳34 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳35 QDP

    ↳36 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳37 QDP

    ↳38 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳39 TRUE

  ↳40 QDP

    ↳41 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳42 QDP

    ↳43 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳44 QDP

    ↳45 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳46 QDP

    ↳47 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳48 QDP

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(length(nil)) → MARK(0)
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → S(length1(Y))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → LENGTH1(Y)
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → LENGTH(X)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
MARK(from(X)) → FROM(mark(X))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH1(mark(X)) → LENGTH1(X)
LENGTH1(active(X)) → LENGTH1(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 6 SCCs with 12 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH1(active(X)) → LENGTH1(X)
LENGTH1(mark(X)) → LENGTH1(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LENGTH1(mark(X)) → LENGTH1(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LENGTH1(x1) = x1
active(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
from(x1) = from
cons(x1, x2) = cons
s(x1) = s
length(x1) = length
nil = nil
0 = 0
length1(x1) = length1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

from > cons > s > mark₁ > nil
from > cons > s > mark₁ > 0
length1 > length > s > mark₁ > nil
length1 > length > s > mark₁ > 0

Status:

from: []
cons: []
length1: []
mark₁: [1]
s: []
length: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH1(active(X)) → LENGTH1(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LENGTH1(active(X)) → LENGTH1(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LENGTH1(x1) = x1
active(x1) = active(x1)
from(x1) = from
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
cons(x1, x2) = cons
s(x1) = s
length(x1) = x1
nil = nil
0 = 0
length1(x1) = length1(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

from > [active₁, mark₁, nil, 0, length1₁] > [cons, s]

Status:

from: []
active₁: [1]
length1₁: [1]
cons: []
mark₁: [1]
s: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LENGTH(x1) = x1
active(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
from(x1) = from
cons(x1, x2) = cons
s(x1) = s
length(x1) = length
nil = nil
0 = 0
length1(x1) = length1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

from > cons > s > mark₁ > nil
from > cons > s > mark₁ > 0
length1 > length > s > mark₁ > nil
length1 > length > s > mark₁ > 0

Status:

from: []
cons: []
length1: []
mark₁: [1]
s: []
length: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LENGTH(x1) = x1
active(x1) = active(x1)
from(x1) = from
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
cons(x1, x2) = cons
s(x1) = s
length(x1) = x1
nil = nil
0 = 0
length1(x1) = length1(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

from > [active₁, mark₁, nil, 0, length1₁] > [cons, s]

Status:

from: []
active₁: [1]
length1₁: [1]
cons: []
mark₁: [1]
s: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(18) TRUE

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = x1
active(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
from(x1) = from
cons(x1, x2) = cons
s(x1) = s
length(x1) = length
nil = nil
0 = 0
length1(x1) = length1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

from > cons > s > mark₁ > nil
from > cons > s > mark₁ > 0
length1 > length > s > mark₁ > nil
length1 > length > s > mark₁ > 0

Status:

from: []
cons: []
length1: []
mark₁: [1]
s: []
length: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(active(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = x1
active(x1) = active(x1)
from(x1) = from
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
cons(x1, x2) = cons
s(x1) = s
length(x1) = x1
nil = nil
0 = 0
length1(x1) = length1(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

from > [active₁, mark₁, nil, 0, length1₁] > [cons, s]

Status:

from: []
active₁: [1]
length1₁: [1]
cons: []
mark₁: [1]
s: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(25) TRUE

(26) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(27) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
CONS(x1, x2) = CONS(x1)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = active(x1)
from(x1) = from
cons(x1, x2) = cons
s(x1) = s
length(x1) = x1
nil = nil
0 = 0
length1(x1) = length1(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[from, cons, s] > [mark₁, active₁, length1₁]
[nil, 0] > [mark₁, active₁, length1₁]

Status:

from: []
active₁: [1]
length1₁: [1]
cons: []
CONS₁: [1]
mark₁: [1]
s: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(28) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(29) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
CONS(x1, x2) = x2
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = active(x1)
from(x1) = from
cons(x1, x2) = cons
s(x1) = s
length(x1) = x1
nil = nil
0 = 0
length1(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[mark₁, active₁, from, cons, nil] > s
[mark₁, active₁, from, cons, nil] > 0

Status:

from: []
active₁: [1]
cons: []
mark₁: [1]
s: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(32) TRUE

(33) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(34) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FROM(x1) = x1
active(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
from(x1) = from
cons(x1, x2) = cons
s(x1) = s
length(x1) = length
nil = nil
0 = 0
length1(x1) = length1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

from > cons > s > mark₁ > nil
from > cons > s > mark₁ > 0
length1 > length > s > mark₁ > nil
length1 > length > s > mark₁ > 0

Status:

from: []
cons: []
length1: []
mark₁: [1]
s: []
length: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(35) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(36) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FROM(x1) = x1
active(x1) = active(x1)
from(x1) = from
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
cons(x1, x2) = cons
s(x1) = s
length(x1) = x1
nil = nil
0 = 0
length1(x1) = length1(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

from > [active₁, mark₁, nil, 0, length1₁] > [cons, s]

Status:

from: []
active₁: [1]
length1₁: [1]
cons: []
mark₁: [1]
s: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(37) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(38) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(39) TRUE

(40) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(41) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)
from(x1) = from(x1)
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE(x1)
mark(x1) = x1
cons(x1, x2) = cons(x1)
s(x1) = x1
length(x1) = length
length1(x1) = length1
active(x1) = x1
nil = nil
0 = 0

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[MARK₁, ACTIVE₁] > from₁ > cons₁
[MARK₁, ACTIVE₁] > [length, length1] > 0
nil > 0

Status:

from₁: [1]
cons₁: [1]
MARK₁: [1]
length1: []
length: []
0: []
nil: []
ACTIVE₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(42) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(43) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK
from(x1) = from
ACTIVE(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = mark
cons(x1, x2) = cons
length(x1) = length
s(x1) = s
length1(x1) = length1
active(x1) = x1
nil = nil
0 = 0

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[MARK, from, mark, cons, length, length1] > nil > 0 > s

Status:

from: []
MARK: []
cons: []
length1: []
mark: []
s: []
length: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(44) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(45) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = x1
from(x1) = from(x1)
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE
mark(x1) = x1
cons(x1, x2) = x2
length(x1) = length
s(x1) = x1
length1(x1) = length1
active(x1) = x1
nil = nil
0 = 0

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

from₁ > [ACTIVE, length, length1, 0]
nil > [ACTIVE, length, length1, 0]

Status:

from₁: [1]
length1: []
length: []
0: []
nil: []
ACTIVE: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(46) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(47) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK
cons(x1, x2) = cons
ACTIVE(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = x1
length(x1) = length
s(x1) = x1
length1(x1) = length1
active(x1) = x1
from(x1) = from(x1)
nil = nil
0 = 0

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[MARK, length, length1] > cons
[MARK, length, length1] > 0
from₁ > cons
nil > 0

Status:

from₁: [1]
MARK: []
length1: []
cons: []
length: []
0: []
nil: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

(48) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.