Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could not be shown:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

Q is empty.

(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost.

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
minsort(nil)
minsort(cons(x0, x1))
min(x0, nil)
min(x0, cons(x1, x2))
del(x0, nil)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE(s(x), s(y)) → LE(x, y)
EQ(s(x), s(y)) → EQ(x, y)
MINSORT(cons(x, y)) → MIN(x, y)
MINSORT(cons(x, y)) → MINSORT(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y)))
MINSORT(cons(x, y)) → DEL(min(x, y), cons(x, y))
MIN(x, cons(y, z)) → IF(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
MIN(x, cons(y, z)) → LE(x, y)
MIN(x, cons(y, z)) → MIN(x, z)
MIN(x, cons(y, z)) → MIN(y, z)
DEL(x, cons(y, z)) → IF(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))
DEL(x, cons(y, z)) → EQ(x, y)
DEL(x, cons(y, z)) → DEL(x, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
minsort(nil)
minsort(cons(x0, x1))
min(x0, nil)
min(x0, cons(x1, x2))
del(x0, nil)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 5 SCCs with 6 less nodes.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(s(x), s(y)) → EQ(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
minsort(nil)
minsort(cons(x0, x1))
min(x0, nil)
min(x0, cons(x1, x2))
del(x0, nil)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

EQ(s(x), s(y)) → EQ(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[EQ₂, s₁]

Status:

s₁: [1]
EQ₂: [1,2]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
minsort(nil)
minsort(cons(x0, x1))
min(x0, nil)
min(x0, cons(x1, x2))
del(x0, nil)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DEL(x, cons(y, z)) → DEL(x, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
minsort(nil)
minsort(cons(x0, x1))
min(x0, nil)
min(x0, cons(x1, x2))
del(x0, nil)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

DEL(x, cons(y, z)) → DEL(x, z)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
DEL(x1, x2)  =  DEL(x2)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x2)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

cons₁: [1]
DEL₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
minsort(nil)
minsort(cons(x0, x1))
min(x0, nil)
min(x0, cons(x1, x2))
del(x0, nil)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(16) TRUE

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE(s(x), s(y)) → LE(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
minsort(nil)
minsort(cons(x0, x1))
min(x0, nil)
min(x0, cons(x1, x2))
del(x0, nil)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LE(s(x), s(y)) → LE(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[LE₂, s₁]

Status:

s₁: [1]
LE₂: [1,2]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
minsort(nil)
minsort(cons(x0, x1))
min(x0, nil)
min(x0, cons(x1, x2))
del(x0, nil)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(21) TRUE

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MIN(x, cons(y, z)) → MIN(y, z)
MIN(x, cons(y, z)) → MIN(x, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
minsort(nil)
minsort(cons(x0, x1))
min(x0, nil)
min(x0, cons(x1, x2))
del(x0, nil)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MIN(x, cons(y, z)) → MIN(y, z)
MIN(x, cons(y, z)) → MIN(x, z)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[MIN₂, cons₂]

Status:

cons₂: [1,2]
MIN₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(24) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
minsort(nil)
minsort(cons(x0, x1))
min(x0, nil)
min(x0, cons(x1, x2))
del(x0, nil)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(25) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(26) TRUE

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINSORT(cons(x, y)) → MINSORT(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
minsort(nil) → nil
minsort(cons(x, y)) → cons(min(x, y), minsort(del(min(x, y), cons(x, y))))
min(x, nil) → x
min(x, cons(y, z)) → if(le(x, y), min(x, z), min(y, z))
del(x, nil) → nil
del(x, cons(y, z)) → if(eq(x, y), z, cons(y, del(x, z)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
minsort(nil)
minsort(cons(x0, x1))
min(x0, nil)
min(x0, cons(x1, x2))
del(x0, nil)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.