Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) → f(x, y, f(z, u, v))
f(x, y, y) → y
f(x, y, g(y)) → x
f(x, x, y) → x
f(g(x), x, y) → y

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) → F(x, y, f(z, u, v))
F(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) → F(z, u, v)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) → f(x, y, f(z, u, v))
f(x, y, y) → y
f(x, y, g(y)) → x
f(x, x, y) → x
f(g(x), x, y) → y

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

F(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) → F(x, y, f(z, u, v))
F(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) → F(z, u, v)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
F(x1, x2, x3)  =  F(x1, x2)
f(x1, x2, x3)  =  f(x1, x2, x3)
g(x1)  =  g

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

g > [F₂, f₃]

Status:

F₂: multiset
f₃: [1,3,2]
g: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

f(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) → f(x, y, f(z, u, v))
f(x, y, y) → y
f(x, y, g(y)) → x
f(x, x, y) → x
f(g(x), x, y) → y

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(x, y, z), u, f(x, y, v)) → f(x, y, f(z, u, v))
f(x, y, y) → y
f(x, y, g(y)) → x
f(x, x, y) → x
f(g(x), x, y) → y

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(6) TRUE