Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(x, g(y, z)) → F(x, y)
++¹(x, g(y, z)) → ++¹(x, y)
MEM(g(x, y), z) → MEM(x, z)
MEM(x, max(x)) → NULL(x)
MAX(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → MAX(g(g(x, y), z))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 4 SCCs with 1 less node.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MAX(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → MAX(g(g(x, y), z))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MAX(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → MAX(g(g(x, y), z))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MAX(x1)  =  x1
g(x1, x2)  =  g(x1, x2)
u  =  u
f(x1, x2)  =  f(x1, x2)
nil  =  nil
++(x1, x2)  =  ++(x1, x2)
null(x1)  =  null(x1)
true  =  true
false  =  false
mem(x1, x2)  =  mem(x1, x2)
or(x1, x2)  =  or(x1, x2)
=(x1, x2)  =  =(x1, x2)
max(x1)  =  max
not(x1)  =  not
max'(x1, x2)  =  max'

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

u > [max, not] > g₂ > max'
f₂ > g₂ > max'
[nil, true] > g₂ > max'
[nil, true] > false
++₂ > g₂ > max'
[null₁, mem₂] > false
[null₁, mem₂] > or₂
[null₁, mem₂] > =₂
[null₁, mem₂] > [max, not] > g₂ > max'

Status:

g₂: [2,1]
u: multiset
f₂: [2,1]
nil: multiset
++₂: multiset
null₁: multiset
true: multiset
false: multiset
mem₂: [2,1]
or₂: multiset
=₂: multiset
max: multiset
not: multiset
max': multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MEM(g(x, y), z) → MEM(x, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MEM(g(x, y), z) → MEM(x, z)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MEM(x1, x2)  =  x1
g(x1, x2)  =  g(x1, x2)
f(x1, x2)  =  f(x1, x2)
nil  =  nil
++(x1, x2)  =  ++(x1, x2)
null(x1)  =  x1
true  =  true
false  =  false
mem(x1, x2)  =  mem
or(x1, x2)  =  x2
=(x1, x2)  =  x1
max(x1)  =  max(x1)
not(x1)  =  not
max'(x1, x2)  =  max'(x1, x2)
u  =  u

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

f₂ > g₂ > max₁ > [false, u]
f₂ > g₂ > max'₂ > [false, u]
nil > g₂ > max₁ > [false, u]
nil > g₂ > max'₂ > [false, u]
nil > true > [false, u]
++₂ > g₂ > max₁ > [false, u]
++₂ > g₂ > max'₂ > [false, u]
[mem, not] > [false, u]

Status:

g₂: multiset
f₂: [1,2]
nil: multiset
++₂: multiset
true: multiset
false: multiset
mem: []
max₁: multiset
not: []
max'₂: multiset
u: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

++¹(x, g(y, z)) → ++¹(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

++¹(x, g(y, z)) → ++¹(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
++¹(x1, x2)  =  x2
g(x1, x2)  =  g(x1)
f(x1, x2)  =  f(x2)
nil  =  nil
++(x1, x2)  =  ++(x1, x2)
null(x1)  =  null(x1)
true  =  true
false  =  false
mem(x1, x2)  =  mem(x1)
or(x1, x2)  =  x2
=(x1, x2)  =  =(x1, x2)
max(x1)  =  max
not(x1)  =  not
max'(x1, x2)  =  max'
u  =  u

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

++₂ > [g₁, f₁, max, max', u] > [nil, true]
++₂ > [g₁, f₁, max, max', u] > [mem₁, not] > false
++₂ > [g₁, f₁, max, max', u] > [mem₁, not] > =₂
null₁ > [nil, true]
null₁ > false

Status:

g₁: [1]
f₁: [1]
nil: multiset
++₂: [2,1]
null₁: multiset
true: multiset
false: multiset
mem₁: [1]
=₂: multiset
max: []
not: []
max': []
u: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(19) TRUE

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(x, g(y, z)) → F(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

F(x, g(y, z)) → F(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
F(x1, x2)  =  F(x2)
g(x1, x2)  =  g(x1, x2)
f(x1, x2)  =  f(x1, x2)
nil  =  nil
++(x1, x2)  =  ++(x1, x2)
null(x1)  =  null(x1)
true  =  true
false  =  false
mem(x1, x2)  =  mem
or(x1, x2)  =  or(x1)
=(x1, x2)  =  =
max(x1)  =  x1
not(x1)  =  not
max'(x1, x2)  =  x2
u  =  u

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

F₁ > u
[f₂, nil] > g₂ > false > u
[f₂, nil] > true > u
++₂ > g₂ > false > u
[mem, not] > null₁ > true > u
[mem, not] > null₁ > false > u
[mem, not] > or₁ > u
[mem, not] > = > u

Status:

F₁: multiset
g₂: multiset
f₂: [2,1]
nil: multiset
++₂: multiset
null₁: [1]
true: multiset
false: multiset
mem: []
or₁: multiset
=: multiset
not: []
u: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, nil) → g(nil, x)
f(x, g(y, z)) → g(f(x, y), z)
++(x, nil) → x
++(x, g(y, z)) → g(++(x, y), z)
null(nil) → true
null(g(x, y)) → false
mem(nil, y) → false
mem(g(x, y), z) → or(=(y, z), mem(x, z))
mem(x, max(x)) → not(null(x))
max(g(g(nil, x), y)) → max'(x, y)
max(g(g(g(x, y), z), u)) → max'(max(g(g(x, y), z)), u)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(24) TRUE