(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
*(*(x, y), z) → *(x, *(y, z))
*(+(x, y), z) → +(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, +(y, f(z))) → *(g(x, z), +(y, y))
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
*1(*(x, y), z) → *1(x, *(y, z))
*1(*(x, y), z) → *1(y, z)
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(x, z)
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(y, z)
*1(x, +(y, f(z))) → *1(g(x, z), +(y, y))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
*(*(x, y), z) → *(x, *(y, z))
*(+(x, y), z) → +(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, +(y, f(z))) → *(g(x, z), +(y, y))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs.
(4) Complex Obligation (AND)
(5) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
*1(x, +(y, f(z))) → *1(g(x, z), +(y, y))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
*(*(x, y), z) → *(x, *(y, z))
*(+(x, y), z) → +(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, +(y, f(z))) → *(g(x, z), +(y, y))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(6) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
*1(*(x, y), z) → *1(y, z)
*1(*(x, y), z) → *1(x, *(y, z))
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(x, z)
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(y, z)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
*(*(x, y), z) → *(x, *(y, z))
*(+(x, y), z) → +(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, +(y, f(z))) → *(g(x, z), +(y, y))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
*1(*(x, y), z) → *1(y, z)
*1(*(x, y), z) → *1(x, *(y, z))
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(x, z)
*1(+(x, y), z) → *1(y, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
*1(
x1,
x2) =
*1(
x1)
*(
x1,
x2) =
*(
x1,
x2)
+(
x1,
x2) =
+(
x1,
x2)
f(
x1) =
f
g(
x1,
x2) =
g(
x1,
x2)
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[*^11, +2, g2] > *2
Status:
f: multiset
*^11: [1]
g2: multiset
*2: [2,1]
+2: multiset
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(8) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
*(*(x, y), z) → *(x, *(y, z))
*(+(x, y), z) → +(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, +(y, f(z))) → *(g(x, z), +(y, y))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(9) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(10) TRUE