(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(g(x), y, y) → g(f(x, x, y))

Q is empty.

(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost.

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(g(x), y, y) → g(f(x, x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(g(x0), x1, x1)

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(g(x), y, y) → F(x, x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(g(x), y, y) → g(f(x, x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(g(x0), x1, x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


F(g(x), y, y) → F(x, x, y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
F(x1, x2, x3)  =  F(x1, x3)
g(x1)  =  g(x1)
f(x1, x2, x3)  =  f(x1, x3)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
f2 > [F2, g1]

Status:
F2: multiset
g1: multiset
f2: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

f(g(x), y, y) → g(f(x, x, y))

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(g(x), y, y) → g(f(x, x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(g(x0), x1, x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(8) TRUE