Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, y) → x
g(a) → h(a, b, a)
i(x) → f(x, x)
h(x, x, y) → g(x)

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[g₁, h₃]
a > b
i₁ > f₂

Status:

g₁: [1]
h₃: [2,3,1]

With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

f(x, y) → x
g(a) → h(a, b, a)
i(x) → f(x, x)
h(x, x, y) → g(x)

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(4) TRUE

(5) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(6) TRUE

(7) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(8) TRUE