(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, y) → x
g(a) → h(a, b, a)
i(x) → f(x, x)
h(x, x, y) → g(x)

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(a) = 0   
POL(b) = 0   
POL(f(x1, x2)) = 2 + x1 + x2   
POL(g(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(h(x1, x2, x3)) = x1 + 2·x2 + 2·x3   
POL(i(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

f(x, y) → x


(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(a) → h(a, b, a)
i(x) → f(x, x)
h(x, x, y) → g(x)

Q is empty.

(3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(a) = 0   
POL(b) = 0   
POL(f(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   
POL(g(x1)) = x1   
POL(h(x1, x2, x3)) = x1 + x2 + 2·x3   
POL(i(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

i(x) → f(x, x)


(4) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(a) → h(a, b, a)
h(x, x, y) → g(x)

Q is empty.

(5) AAECC Innermost (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We have applied [NOC,AAECCNOC] to switch to innermost. The TRS R 1 is none

The TRS R 2 is

g(a) → h(a, b, a)
h(x, x, y) → g(x)

The signature Sigma is {h, g}

(6) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(a) → h(a, b, a)
h(x, x, y) → g(x)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

g(a)
h(x0, x0, x1)

(7) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

G(a) → H(a, b, a)
H(x, x, y) → G(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(a) → h(a, b, a)
h(x, x, y) → g(x)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

g(a)
h(x0, x0, x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(10) TRUE