(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, g(x)) → x
f(x, h(y)) → f(h(x), y)
Q is empty.
(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(f(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(g(x1)) = x1
POL(h(x1)) = x1
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:
f(x, g(x)) → x
(2) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, h(y)) → f(h(x), y)
Q is empty.
(3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(f(x1, x2)) = x1 + 2·x2
POL(h(x1)) = 2 + x1
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:
f(x, h(y)) → f(h(x), y)
(4) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.
(5) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.
(6) TRUE
(7) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.
(8) TRUE
(9) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.
(10) TRUE