(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(x)) → b(b(a(x)))
Q is empty.
(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost.
(2) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(x)) → b(b(a(x)))
The set Q consists of the following terms:
a(b(x0))
(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
A(b(x)) → A(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(x)) → b(b(a(x)))
The set Q consists of the following terms:
a(b(x0))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
A(b(x)) → A(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
a1 > b1
Status:
A1: multiset
b1: multiset
a1: multiset
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
a(b(x)) → b(b(a(x)))
(6) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a(b(x)) → b(b(a(x)))
The set Q consists of the following terms:
a(b(x0))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(7) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(8) TRUE