Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

or(x, x) → x
and(x, x) → x
not(not(x)) → x
not(and(x, y)) → or(not(x), not(y))
not(or(x, y)) → and(not(x), not(y))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Precedence:

not₁ > or₂ > and₂

Status:

or₂: [1,2]
and₂: [1,2]
not₁: [1]

With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

or(x, x) → x
and(x, x) → x
not(not(x)) → x
not(and(x, y)) → or(not(x), not(y))
not(or(x, y)) → and(not(x), not(y))

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(4) TRUE