Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

not(true) → false
not(false) → true
odd(0) → false
odd(s(x)) → not(odd(x))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Recursive Path Order [RPO].
Precedence:

0 > [not₁, false, odd₁] > true
+₂ > s₁ > [not₁, false, odd₁] > true

With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

not(true) → false
not(false) → true
odd(0) → false
odd(s(x)) → not(odd(x))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(4) TRUE