Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpG3HeoM/2.19.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 Overlay + Local Confluence (⇔)

↳2 QTRS

↳3 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳4 QDP

↳5 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳6 AND

  ↳7 QDP

    ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳9 QDP

    ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳11 TRUE

  ↳12 QDP

    ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳14 QDP

    ↳15 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳16 TRUE

  ↳17 QDP

    ↳18 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

    ↳19 QDP

    ↳20 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

    ↳21 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

Q is empty.

(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost.

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

sqr(0)
sqr(s(x0))
double(0)
double(s(x0))
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SQR(s(x)) → +¹(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
SQR(s(x)) → SQR(x)
SQR(s(x)) → DOUBLE(x)
DOUBLE(s(x)) → DOUBLE(x)
+¹(x, s(y)) → +¹(x, y)
SQR(s(x)) → +¹(sqr(x), double(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

sqr(0)
sqr(s(x0))
double(0)
double(s(x0))
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

+¹(x, s(y)) → +¹(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

sqr(0)
sqr(s(x0))
double(0)
double(s(x0))
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

+¹(x, s(y)) → +¹(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Precedence:

+^1₂ > s₁
sqr₁ > +₂ > s₁
sqr₁ > double₁ > s₁
0 > s₁

Status:

+^1₂: multiset
s₁: multiset
sqr₁: multiset
0: multiset
+₂: multiset
double₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

sqr(0)
sqr(s(x0))
double(0)
double(s(x0))
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DOUBLE(s(x)) → DOUBLE(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

sqr(0)
sqr(s(x0))
double(0)
double(s(x0))
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

DOUBLE(s(x)) → DOUBLE(x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Precedence:

sqr₁ > +₂ > s₁
sqr₁ > double₁ > s₁
sqr₁ > double₁ > 0

Status:

DOUBLE₁: [1]
s₁: multiset
sqr₁: multiset
0: multiset
+₂: [1,2]
double₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

sqr(0)
sqr(s(x0))
double(0)
double(s(x0))
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(16) TRUE

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SQR(s(x)) → SQR(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

sqr(0)
sqr(s(x0))
double(0)
double(s(x0))
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

SQR(s(x)) → SQR(x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Precedence:

sqr₁ > +₂ > s₁
sqr₁ > double₁ > s₁
sqr₁ > double₁ > 0

Status:

SQR₁: [1]
s₁: multiset
sqr₁: multiset
0: multiset
+₂: [1,2]
double₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

sqr(0) → 0
sqr(s(x)) → +(sqr(x), s(double(x)))
double(0) → 0
double(s(x)) → s(s(double(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
sqr(s(x)) → s(+(sqr(x), double(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

sqr(0)
sqr(s(x0))
double(0)
double(s(x0))
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) Obligation:

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) Obligation:

(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(16) TRUE

(17) Obligation:

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(19) Obligation:

(20) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(21) TRUE