Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(minus(x)) → x
minus(h(x)) → h(minus(x))
minus(f(x, y)) → f(minus(y), minus(x))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Recursive Path Order [RPO].
Precedence:

[minus₁, h₁, f₂]

With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

minus(minus(x)) → x
minus(f(x, y)) → f(minus(y), minus(x))

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(h(x)) → h(minus(x))

Q is empty.

(3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Recursive Path Order [RPO].
Precedence:

minus₁ > h₁

With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

minus(h(x)) → h(minus(x))

(4) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(5) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(6) TRUE