Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 Overlay + Local Confluence (⇔)
↳2 QTRS
↳3 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳4 QDP
↳5 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳6 AND
  ↳7 QDP
    ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳9 QDP
    ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳11 TRUE
  ↳12 QDP
    ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳14 QDP
    ↳15 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳16 TRUE
  ↳17 QDP
    ↳18 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳19 QDP
    ↳20 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
    ↳21 TRUE
  ↳22 QDP
    ↳23 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳24 QDP
    ↳25 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
    ↳26 TRUE
  ↳27 QDP
    ↳28 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
    ↳29 QDP
    ↳30 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
    ↳31 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

Q is empty.

(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost.

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(s(X), s(Y)) → EQ(X, Y)
LE(s(X), s(Y)) → LE(X, Y)
MIN(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → IFMIN(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
MIN(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → LE(N, M)
IFMIN(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(N, L))
IFMIN(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(M, L))
REPLACE(N, M, cons(K, L)) → IFREPL(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
REPLACE(N, M, cons(K, L)) → EQ(N, K)
IFREPL(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → REPLACE(N, M, L)
SELSORT(cons(N, L)) → IFSELSORT(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
SELSORT(cons(N, L)) → EQ(N, min(cons(N, L)))
SELSORT(cons(N, L)) → MIN(cons(N, L))
IFSELSORT(true, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(L)
IFSELSORT(false, cons(N, L)) → MIN(cons(N, L))
IFSELSORT(false, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L))
IFSELSORT(false, cons(N, L)) → REPLACE(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 5 SCCs with 6 less nodes.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE(s(X), s(Y)) → LE(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


LE(s(X), s(Y)) → LE(X, Y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LE(x1, x2)  =  x2
s(x1)  =  s(x1)

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MIN(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → IFMIN(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
IFMIN(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(N, L))
IFMIN(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(M, L))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MIN(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → IFMIN(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
IFMIN(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(N, L))
IFMIN(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → MIN(cons(M, L))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MIN(x1)  =  MIN(x1)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
IFMIN(x1, x2)  =  IFMIN(x1, x2)
le(x1, x2)  =  x1
true  =  true
false  =  false
0  =  0
s(x1)  =  x1

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
cons2 > [MIN1, IFMIN2, false]
0 > true > [MIN1, IFMIN2, false]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(16) TRUE

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(s(X), s(Y)) → EQ(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


EQ(s(X), s(Y)) → EQ(X, Y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
EQ(x1, x2)  =  x2
s(x1)  =  s(x1)

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
trivial


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(21) TRUE

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REPLACE(N, M, cons(K, L)) → IFREPL(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
IFREPL(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → REPLACE(N, M, L)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


IFREPL(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → REPLACE(N, M, L)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
REPLACE(x1, x2, x3)  =  REPLACE(x1, x2, x3)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
IFREPL(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  IFREPL(x2, x3, x4)
eq(x1, x2)  =  x2
false  =  false
s(x1)  =  s
0  =  0
true  =  true

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
[false, s, 0] > true > [REPLACE3, cons2, IFREPL3]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(24) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REPLACE(N, M, cons(K, L)) → IFREPL(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(25) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(26) TRUE

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IFSELSORT(true, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(L)
SELSORT(cons(N, L)) → IFSELSORT(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
IFSELSORT(false, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


IFSELSORT(true, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(L)
IFSELSORT(false, cons(N, L)) → SELSORT(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
IFSELSORT(x1, x2)  =  x2
true  =  true
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x2)
SELSORT(x1)  =  x1
eq(x1, x2)  =  eq(x1)
min(x1)  =  min
false  =  false
replace(x1, x2, x3)  =  x3
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
0  =  0
nil  =  nil
ifmin(x1, x2)  =  ifmin(x1)
le(x1, x2)  =  le(x1)
ifrepl(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  x4

Lexicographic Path Order [LPO].
Precedence:
[true, eq1] > [cons1, 0] > min > [false, s1]
nil > [cons1, 0] > min > [false, s1]
ifmin1 > [cons1, 0] > min > [false, s1]
le1 > [false, s1]


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))

(29) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SELSORT(cons(N, L)) → IFSELSORT(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(Y)) → false
eq(s(X), 0) → false
eq(s(X), s(Y)) → eq(X, Y)
le(0, Y) → true
le(s(X), 0) → false
le(s(X), s(Y)) → le(X, Y)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(N), nil)) → s(N)
min(cons(N, cons(M, L))) → ifmin(le(N, M), cons(N, cons(M, L)))
ifmin(true, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(N, L))
ifmin(false, cons(N, cons(M, L))) → min(cons(M, L))
replace(N, M, nil) → nil
replace(N, M, cons(K, L)) → ifrepl(eq(N, K), N, M, cons(K, L))
ifrepl(true, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(M, L)
ifrepl(false, N, M, cons(K, L)) → cons(K, replace(N, M, L))
selsort(nil) → nil
selsort(cons(N, L)) → ifselsort(eq(N, min(cons(N, L))), cons(N, L))
ifselsort(true, cons(N, L)) → cons(N, selsort(L))
ifselsort(false, cons(N, L)) → cons(min(cons(N, L)), selsort(replace(min(cons(N, L)), N, L)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
le(0, x0)
le(s(x0), 0)
le(s(x0), s(x1))
min(cons(0, nil))
min(cons(s(x0), nil))
min(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(true, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
ifmin(false, cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
replace(x0, x1, nil)
replace(x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(true, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
ifrepl(false, x0, x1, cons(x2, x3))
selsort(nil)
selsort(cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(true, cons(x0, x1))
ifselsort(false, cons(x0, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(30) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(31) TRUE