(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
div(X, e) → i(X)
i(div(X, Y)) → div(Y, X)
div(div(X, Y), Z) → div(Y, div(i(X), Z))
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
DIV(X, e) → I(X)
I(div(X, Y)) → DIV(Y, X)
DIV(div(X, Y), Z) → DIV(Y, div(i(X), Z))
DIV(div(X, Y), Z) → DIV(i(X), Z)
DIV(div(X, Y), Z) → I(X)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
div(X, e) → i(X)
i(div(X, Y)) → div(Y, X)
div(div(X, Y), Z) → div(Y, div(i(X), Z))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
I(div(X, Y)) → DIV(Y, X)
DIV(div(X, Y), Z) → DIV(Y, div(i(X), Z))
DIV(div(X, Y), Z) → DIV(i(X), Z)
DIV(div(X, Y), Z) → I(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
DIV(
x1,
x2) =
x1
e =
e
I(
x1) =
x1
div(
x1,
x2) =
div(
x1,
x2)
i(
x1) =
i(
x1)
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[e, div2, i1]
Status:
e: []
div2: [1,2]
i1: [1]
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
div(X, e) → i(X)
i(div(X, Y)) → div(Y, X)
div(div(X, Y), Z) → div(Y, div(i(X), Z))
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
DIV(X, e) → I(X)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
div(X, e) → i(X)
i(div(X, Y)) → div(Y, X)
div(div(X, Y), Z) → div(Y, div(i(X), Z))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.
(6) TRUE