Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

div(X, e) → i(X)
i(div(X, Y)) → div(Y, X)
div(div(X, Y), Z) → div(Y, div(i(X), Z))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

e > [div₂, i₁]

Status:

i₁: [1]
div₂: [1,2]
e: multiset

With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

div(X, e) → i(X)
i(div(X, Y)) → div(Y, X)
div(div(X, Y), Z) → div(Y, div(i(X), Z))

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(4) TRUE