Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

rev(ls) → r1(ls, empty)
r1(empty, a) → a
r1(cons(x, k), a) → r1(k, cons(x, a))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

rev₁ > r1₂ > cons₂
rev₁ > empty

Status:

r1₂: [1,2]

With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

rev(ls) → r1(ls, empty)
r1(empty, a) → a
r1(cons(x, k), a) → r1(k, cons(x, a))

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(4) TRUE