(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
p(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → p(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
P(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → P(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))
P(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → P(a(a(x1)), x2)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
p(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → p(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
P(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → P(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))
P(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → P(a(a(x1)), x2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[P2, p2] > b1 > a1
Status:
P2: multiset
a1: [1]
b1: [1]
p2: [2,1]
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
p(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → p(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
p(a(x0), p(a(b(x1)), x2)) → p(a(b(a(x2))), p(a(a(x1)), x2))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(6) TRUE