Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could not be shown:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

h(z, e(x)) → h(c(z), d(z, x))
d(z, g(0, 0)) → e(0)
d(z, g(x, y)) → g(e(x), d(z, y))
d(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → g(d(c(z), g(x, y)), d(z, g(x, y)))
g(e(x), e(y)) → e(g(x, y))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

H(z, e(x)) → H(c(z), d(z, x))
H(z, e(x)) → D(z, x)
D(z, g(x, y)) → G(e(x), d(z, y))
D(z, g(x, y)) → D(z, y)
D(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → G(d(c(z), g(x, y)), d(z, g(x, y)))
D(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → D(c(z), g(x, y))
D(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → D(z, g(x, y))
G(e(x), e(y)) → G(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

h(z, e(x)) → h(c(z), d(z, x))
d(z, g(0, 0)) → e(0)
d(z, g(x, y)) → g(e(x), d(z, y))
d(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → g(d(c(z), g(x, y)), d(z, g(x, y)))
g(e(x), e(y)) → e(g(x, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

G(e(x), e(y)) → G(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

h(z, e(x)) → h(c(z), d(z, x))
d(z, g(0, 0)) → e(0)
d(z, g(x, y)) → g(e(x), d(z, y))
d(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → g(d(c(z), g(x, y)), d(z, g(x, y)))
g(e(x), e(y)) → e(g(x, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

G(e(x), e(y)) → G(x, y)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• G(e(x), e(y)) → G(x, y)
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → D(c(z), g(x, y))
D(z, g(x, y)) → D(z, y)
D(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → D(z, g(x, y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

h(z, e(x)) → h(c(z), d(z, x))
d(z, g(0, 0)) → e(0)
d(z, g(x, y)) → g(e(x), d(z, y))
d(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → g(d(c(z), g(x, y)), d(z, g(x, y)))
g(e(x), e(y)) → e(g(x, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → D(c(z), g(x, y))
D(z, g(x, y)) → D(z, y)
D(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → D(z, g(x, y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

g(e(x), e(y)) → e(g(x, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• D(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → D(c(z), g(x, y))
  The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

• D(z, g(x, y)) → D(z, y)
  The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

• D(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → D(z, g(x, y))
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

H(z, e(x)) → H(c(z), d(z, x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

h(z, e(x)) → h(c(z), d(z, x))
d(z, g(0, 0)) → e(0)
d(z, g(x, y)) → g(e(x), d(z, y))
d(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → g(d(c(z), g(x, y)), d(z, g(x, y)))
g(e(x), e(y)) → e(g(x, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) Instantiation (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule H(z, e(x)) → H(c(z), d(z, x)) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

H(c(y_0), e(x1)) → H(c(c(y_0)), d(c(y_0), x1))

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

H(c(y_0), e(x1)) → H(c(c(y_0)), d(c(y_0), x1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

h(z, e(x)) → h(c(z), d(z, x))
d(z, g(0, 0)) → e(0)
d(z, g(x, y)) → g(e(x), d(z, y))
d(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → g(d(c(z), g(x, y)), d(z, g(x, y)))
g(e(x), e(y)) → e(g(x, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) Instantiation (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule H(c(y_0), e(x1)) → H(c(c(y_0)), d(c(y_0), x1)) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

H(c(c(y_0)), e(x1)) → H(c(c(c(y_0))), d(c(c(y_0)), x1))

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

H(c(c(y_0)), e(x1)) → H(c(c(c(y_0))), d(c(c(y_0)), x1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

h(z, e(x)) → h(c(z), d(z, x))
d(z, g(0, 0)) → e(0)
d(z, g(x, y)) → g(e(x), d(z, y))
d(c(z), g(g(x, y), 0)) → g(d(c(z), g(x, y)), d(z, g(x, y)))
g(e(x), e(y)) → e(g(x, y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.