(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
\(x, x) → e
/(x, x) → e
.(e, x) → x
.(x, e) → x
\(e, x) → x
/(x, e) → x
.(x, \(x, y)) → y
.(/(y, x), x) → y
\(x, .(x, y)) → y
/(.(y, x), x) → y
/(x, \(y, x)) → y
\(/(x, y), x) → y
Q is empty.
(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(.(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(/(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(\(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(e) = 0
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:
.(e, x) → x
.(x, e) → x
.(x, \(x, y)) → y
.(/(y, x), x) → y
\(x, .(x, y)) → y
/(.(y, x), x) → y
(2) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
\(x, x) → e
/(x, x) → e
\(e, x) → x
/(x, e) → x
/(x, \(y, x)) → y
\(/(x, y), x) → y
Q is empty.
(3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(/(x1, x2)) = 2 + x1 + x2
POL(\(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(e) = 1
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:
/(x, x) → e
\(e, x) → x
/(x, e) → x
/(x, \(y, x)) → y
\(/(x, y), x) → y
(4) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
\(x, x) → e
Q is empty.
(5) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(\(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(e) = 0
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:
\(x, x) → e
(6) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.
(7) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.
(8) TRUE
(9) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.
(10) TRUE