(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a, h(x)) → f(g(x), h(x))
h(g(x)) → h(a)
g(h(x)) → g(x)
h(h(x)) → x
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(a, h(x)) → F(g(x), h(x))
F(a, h(x)) → G(x)
H(g(x)) → H(a)
G(h(x)) → G(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a, h(x)) → f(g(x), h(x))
h(g(x)) → h(a)
g(h(x)) → g(x)
h(h(x)) → x
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 2 less nodes.
(4) Complex Obligation (AND)
(5) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
G(h(x)) → G(x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a, h(x)) → f(g(x), h(x))
h(g(x)) → h(a)
g(h(x)) → g(x)
h(h(x)) → x
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
G(h(x)) → G(x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
h1 > G1
Status:
h1: multiset
G1: multiset
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(7) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a, h(x)) → f(g(x), h(x))
h(g(x)) → h(a)
g(h(x)) → g(x)
h(h(x)) → x
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(8) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(9) TRUE
(10) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(a, h(x)) → F(g(x), h(x))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a, h(x)) → f(g(x), h(x))
h(g(x)) → h(a)
g(h(x)) → g(x)
h(h(x)) → x
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
F(a, h(x)) → F(g(x), h(x))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
F(
x1,
x2) =
F(
x1)
a =
a
h(
x1) =
x1
g(
x1) =
g
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
a > F1 > g
Status:
a: multiset
g: multiset
F1: multiset
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
g(h(x)) → g(x)
(12) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(a, h(x)) → f(g(x), h(x))
h(g(x)) → h(a)
g(h(x)) → g(x)
h(h(x)) → x
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(13) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(14) TRUE