(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
div(0, y) → 0
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0, s(y), z) → 0
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0, s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
DIV(x, y) → QUOT(x, y, y)
QUOT(s(x), s(y), z) → QUOT(x, y, z)
QUOT(x, 0, s(z)) → DIV(x, s(z))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
div(0, y) → 0
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0, s(y), z) → 0
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0, s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
QUOT(s(x), s(y), z) → QUOT(x, y, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
DIV(
x1,
x2) =
x1
QUOT(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
x1
s(
x1) =
s(
x1)
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Precedence:
trivial
Status:
trivial
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
DIV(x, y) → QUOT(x, y, y)
QUOT(x, 0, s(z)) → DIV(x, s(z))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
div(0, y) → 0
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0, s(y), z) → 0
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0, s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
QUOT(x, 0, s(z)) → DIV(x, s(z))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
DIV(
x1,
x2) =
x2
QUOT(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
x2
0 =
0
s(
x1) =
s
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Precedence:
0 > s
Status:
trivial
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(6) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
DIV(x, y) → QUOT(x, y, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
div(0, y) → 0
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0, s(y), z) → 0
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0, s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.
(8) TRUE