Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(0) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
log(s(0)) → 0
log(s(s(x))) → s(log(s(half(x))))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Precedence:

log₁ > 0 > half₁
log₁ > s₁ > half₁

Status:

half₁: multiset
log₁: [1]
s₁: [1]
0: multiset

With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

half(0) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
log(s(0)) → 0
log(s(s(x))) → s(log(s(half(x))))

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(4) TRUE