Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could not be shown:

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → s(0)
f(s(0)) → s(0)
f(s(s(x))) → f(f(s(x)))

Q is empty.

(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost.

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → s(0)
f(s(0)) → s(0)
f(s(s(x))) → f(f(s(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(0)
f(s(0))
f(s(s(x0)))

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(s(s(x))) → F(f(s(x)))
F(s(s(x))) → F(s(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → s(0)
f(s(0)) → s(0)
f(s(s(x))) → f(f(s(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(0)
f(s(0))
f(s(s(x0)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

F(s(s(x))) → F(s(x))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

F₁ > [s₁, f₁] > 0

Status:

F₁: [1]
s₁: [1]
f₁: [1]
0: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

f(s(0)) → s(0)
f(s(s(x))) → f(f(s(x)))
f(0) → s(0)

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(s(s(x))) → F(f(s(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → s(0)
f(s(0)) → s(0)
f(s(s(x))) → f(f(s(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(0)
f(s(0))
f(s(s(x0)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.