Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, y, w, w, a) → g1(x, x, y, w)
f(x, y, w, a, a) → g1(y, x, x, w)
f(x, y, a, a, w) → g2(x, y, y, w)
f(x, y, a, w, w) → g2(y, y, x, w)
g1(x, x, y, a) → h(x, y)
g1(y, x, x, a) → h(x, y)
g2(x, y, y, a) → h(x, y)
g2(y, y, x, a) → h(x, y)
h(x, x) → x
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, y, w, w, a) → g1(x, x, y, w)
f(x, y, w, a, a) → g1(y, x, x, w)
f(x, y, a, a, w) → g2(x, y, y, w)
f(x, y, a, w, w) → g2(y, y, x, w)
g1(x, x, y, a) → h(x, y)
g1(y, x, x, a) → h(x, y)
g2(x, y, y, a) → h(x, y)
g2(y, y, x, a) → h(x, y)
h(x, x) → x
Q is empty.
The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, y, w, w, a) → g1(x, x, y, w)
f(x, y, w, a, a) → g1(y, x, x, w)
f(x, y, a, a, w) → g2(x, y, y, w)
f(x, y, a, w, w) → g2(y, y, x, w)
g1(x, x, y, a) → h(x, y)
g1(y, x, x, a) → h(x, y)
g2(x, y, y, a) → h(x, y)
g2(y, y, x, a) → h(x, y)
h(x, x) → x
Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:
f(x, y, w, w, a) → g1(x, x, y, w)
f(x, y, w, a, a) → g1(y, x, x, w)
f(x, y, a, a, w) → g2(x, y, y, w)
f(x, y, a, w, w) → g2(y, y, x, w)
g1(x, x, y, a) → h(x, y)
g1(y, x, x, a) → h(x, y)
h(x, x) → x
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(a) = 1
POL(f(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)) = 2 + 2·x1 + 2·x2 + 2·x3 + x4 + 2·x5
POL(g1(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = 2 + x1 + x2 + x3 + 2·x4
POL(g2(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = 1 + x1 + x2 + x3 + x4
POL(h(x1, x2)) = 2 + x1 + x2
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g2(x, y, y, a) → h(x, y)
g2(y, y, x, a) → h(x, y)
Q is empty.
The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g2(x, y, y, a) → h(x, y)
g2(y, y, x, a) → h(x, y)
Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:
g2(x, y, y, a) → h(x, y)
g2(y, y, x, a) → h(x, y)
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(a) = 2
POL(g2(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = 2·x1 + 2·x2 + 2·x3 + 2·x4
POL(h(x1, x2)) = 2 + x1 + x2
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RisEmptyProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.