Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpXxmyR2/cime5.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

intersect'ii'in(cons(X, X0), cons(X, X1)) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → u'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'1'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → u'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'2'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'3'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'4'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
u'5'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
u'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → u'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'6'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
u'7'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
u'8'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
u'9'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
u'10'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
u'11'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
u'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → u'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))
u'12'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → u'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'13'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
u'14'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → u'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
u'15'1(intersect'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
tautology'i'in(F) → u'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
u'16'1(reduce'ii'out) → tautology'i'out

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

intersect'ii'in(cons(X, X0), cons(X, X1)) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → u'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'1'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → u'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'2'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'3'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'4'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
u'5'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
u'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → u'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'6'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
u'7'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
u'8'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
u'9'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
u'10'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
u'11'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
u'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → u'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))
u'12'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → u'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'13'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
u'14'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → u'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
u'15'1(intersect'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
tautology'i'in(F) → u'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
u'16'1(reduce'ii'out) → tautology'i'out

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAUTOLOGY'I'IN(F) → U'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF)
INTERSECT'II'IN(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → U'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → U'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → INTERSECT'II'IN(F1, F2)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF)
INTERSECT'II'IN(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, Ys)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → U'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → U'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → U'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → U'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → U'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
U'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)
INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → U'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → U'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → U'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, Ys)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF)
TAUTOLOGY'I'IN(F) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → U'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right)))
U'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → U'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

intersect'ii'in(cons(X, X0), cons(X, X1)) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → u'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'1'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → u'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'2'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'3'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'4'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
u'5'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
u'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → u'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'6'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
u'7'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
u'8'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
u'9'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
u'10'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
u'11'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
u'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → u'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))
u'12'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → u'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'13'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
u'14'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → u'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
u'15'1(intersect'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
tautology'i'in(F) → u'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
u'16'1(reduce'ii'out) → tautology'i'out

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAUTOLOGY'I'IN(F) → U'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF)
INTERSECT'II'IN(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → U'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → U'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → INTERSECT'II'IN(F1, F2)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF)
INTERSECT'II'IN(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, Ys)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → U'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → U'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → U'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → U'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → U'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
U'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)
INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → U'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → U'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → U'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, Ys)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF)
TAUTOLOGY'I'IN(F) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → U'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right)))
U'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → U'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

intersect'ii'in(cons(X, X0), cons(X, X1)) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → u'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'1'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → u'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'2'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'3'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'4'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
u'5'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
u'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → u'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'6'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
u'7'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
u'8'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
u'9'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
u'10'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
u'11'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
u'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → u'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))
u'12'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → u'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'13'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
u'14'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → u'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
u'15'1(intersect'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
tautology'i'in(F) → u'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
u'16'1(reduce'ii'out) → tautology'i'out

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 2 SCCs with 18 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, Ys)
INTERSECT'II'IN(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, Ys)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

intersect'ii'in(cons(X, X0), cons(X, X1)) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → u'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'1'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → u'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'2'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'3'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'4'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
u'5'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
u'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → u'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'6'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
u'7'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
u'8'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
u'9'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
u'10'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
u'11'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
u'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → u'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))
u'12'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → u'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'13'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
u'14'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → u'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
u'15'1(intersect'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
tautology'i'in(F) → u'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
u'16'1(reduce'ii'out) → tautology'i'out

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [15] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its argument. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, Ys)
INTERSECT'II'IN(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, Ys)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, Ys)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
INTERSECT'II'IN(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → INTERSECT'II'IN(Xs, Ys)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF)
U'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)
U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → U'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right)))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

intersect'ii'in(cons(X, X0), cons(X, X1)) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → u'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'1'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → u'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'2'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'3'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'4'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
u'5'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
u'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → u'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'6'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
u'7'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
u'8'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
u'9'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
u'10'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
u'11'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
u'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → u'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))
u'12'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → u'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'13'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
u'14'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → u'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
u'15'1(intersect'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
tautology'i'in(F) → u'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
u'16'1(reduce'ii'out) → tautology'i'out

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right))
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF)
U'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)
U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → U'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF)

Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [3]:
Non-tuple symbols:

M( x'2b(x₁, x₂) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	1	0	\
\	0	1	/

x₁

/	0	1	\
\	1	0	/

x₂

M( intersect'ii'out ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

M( u'2'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( iff(x₁, x₂) ) =

/	1	\
\	1	/

/	1	1	\
\	1	1	/

x₁

/	1	1	\
\	1	1	/

x₂

M( u'15'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( u'12'2(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( reduce'ii'out ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

M( u'10'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( p(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	1	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( u'6'2(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( x'2d(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	1	1	/

x₁

M( u'11'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( u'6'1(x₁, ..., x₅) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₂

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₃

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₄

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₅

M( sequent(x₁, x₂) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	1	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

/	1	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₂

M( x'2a(x₁, x₂) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	1	1	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

/	1	0	\
\	0	1	/

x₂

M( u'14'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( nil ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

M( if(x₁, x₂) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	1	\
\	1	0	/

x₁

/	1	1	\
\	0	0	/

x₂

M( reduce'ii'in(x₁, x₂) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₂

M( u'4'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( u'9'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( u'7'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( u'12'1(x₁, ..., x₅) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₂

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₃

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₄

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₅

M( intersect'ii'in(x₁, x₂) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₂

M( u'5'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( u'8'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( u'3'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( cons(x₁, x₂) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	1	1	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

/	1	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₂

M( u'13'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

M( u'1'1(x₁) ) =

/	0	\
\	0	/

/	0	0	\
\	0	0	/

x₁

Tuple symbols:

M( REDUCE'II'IN(x₁, x₂) ) =

[

]

x₁

[

]

x₂

M( U'12'1(x₁, ..., x₅) ) =

[

]

x₁

[

]

x₂

[

]

x₃

[

]

x₄

[

]

x₅

M( U'6'1(x₁, ..., x₅) ) =

[

]

x₁

[

]

x₂

[

]

x₃

[

]

x₄

[

]

x₅

Matrix type:
We used a basic matrix type which is not further parametrizeable.

As matrix orders are CE-compatible, we used usable rules w.r.t. argument filtering in the order.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → U'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF)
U'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

intersect'ii'in(cons(X, X0), cons(X, X1)) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → u'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'1'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → u'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'2'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'3'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'4'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
u'5'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
u'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → u'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'6'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
u'7'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
u'8'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
u'9'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
u'10'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
u'11'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
u'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → u'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))
u'12'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → u'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'13'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
u'14'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → u'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
u'15'1(intersect'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
tautology'i'in(F) → u'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
u'16'1(reduce'ii'out) → tautology'i'out

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → U'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
U'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(REDUCE'II'IN(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(U'12'1(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = x₂ + x₃ + x₄
POL(U'6'1(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = x₂ + x₃ + x₄
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(if(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(iff(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(intersect'ii'in(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(intersect'ii'out) = 0
POL(nil) = 0
POL(p(x₁)) = 0
POL(reduce'ii'in(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(reduce'ii'out) = 0
POL(sequent(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(u'1'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'10'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'11'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'12'1(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 0
POL(u'12'2(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'13'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'14'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'15'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'2'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'3'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'4'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'5'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'6'1(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 0
POL(u'6'2(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'7'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'8'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'9'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(x'2a(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(x'2b(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(x'2d(x₁)) = x₁

The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF)
U'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

intersect'ii'in(cons(X, X0), cons(X, X1)) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → u'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'1'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → u'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'2'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'3'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'4'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
u'5'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
u'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → u'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'6'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
u'7'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
u'8'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
u'9'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
u'10'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
u'11'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
u'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → u'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))
u'12'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → u'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'13'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
u'14'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → u'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
u'15'1(intersect'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
tautology'i'in(F) → u'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
u'16'1(reduce'ii'out) → tautology'i'out

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

intersect'ii'in(cons(X, X0), cons(X, X1)) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → u'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'1'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → u'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'2'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'3'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'4'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
u'5'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
u'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → u'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'6'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
u'7'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
u'8'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
u'9'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
u'10'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
u'11'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
u'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → u'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))
u'12'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → u'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'13'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
u'14'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → u'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
u'15'1(intersect'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
tautology'i'in(F) → u'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
u'16'1(reduce'ii'out) → tautology'i'out

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → U'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(REDUCE'II'IN(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U'6'1(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃ + x₄ + x₅
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(if(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(iff(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(intersect'ii'in(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(intersect'ii'out) = 1
POL(nil) = 0
POL(p(x₁)) = x₁
POL(reduce'ii'in(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(reduce'ii'out) = 0
POL(sequent(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(u'1'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'10'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'11'1(x₁)) = 1
POL(u'12'1(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 1
POL(u'12'2(x₁)) = 1
POL(u'13'1(x₁)) = 1
POL(u'14'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'15'1(x₁)) = x₁
POL(u'2'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'3'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'4'1(x₁)) = 1
POL(u'5'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'6'1(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = x₅
POL(u'6'2(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'7'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'8'1(x₁)) = 0
POL(u'9'1(x₁)) = 1
POL(x'2a(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(x'2b(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(x'2d(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF)
REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

intersect'ii'in(cons(X, X0), cons(X, X1)) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → u'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'1'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → u'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'2'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'3'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'4'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
u'5'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
u'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → u'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'6'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
u'7'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
u'8'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
u'9'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
u'10'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
u'11'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
u'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → u'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))
u'12'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → u'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'13'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
u'14'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → u'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
u'15'1(intersect'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
tautology'i'in(F) → u'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
u'16'1(reduce'ii'out) → tautology'i'out

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

intersect'ii'in(cons(X, X0), cons(X, X1)) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(Xs, cons(X0, Ys)) → u'1'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'1'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
intersect'ii'in(cons(X0, Xs), Ys) → u'2'1(intersect'ii'in(Xs, Ys))
u'2'1(intersect'ii'out) → intersect'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(if(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'3'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'3'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(iff(A, B), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'4'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Fs), Gs), NF))
u'4'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2a(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'5'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, cons(F2, Fs)), Gs), NF))
u'5'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2b(F1, F2), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'6'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F1, Fs), Gs), NF), F2, Fs, Gs, NF)
u'6'1(reduce'ii'out, F2, Fs, Gs, NF) → u'6'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(F2, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'6'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(x'2d(F1), Fs), Gs), NF) → u'7'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(F1, Gs)), NF))
u'7'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(if(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'8'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(x'2d(B), A), Gs)), NF))
u'8'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(iff(A, B), Gs)), NF) → u'9'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(if(A, B), if(B, A)), Gs)), NF))
u'9'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(p(V), Fs), Gs), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'10'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, Gs), sequent(cons(p(V), Left), Right)))
u'10'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'11'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF))
u'11'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2a(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → u'12'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, Gs)), NF), Fs, G2, Gs, NF)
u'12'1(reduce'ii'out, Fs, G2, Gs, NF) → u'12'2(reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(G2, Gs)), NF))
u'12'2(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2d(G1), Gs)), NF) → u'13'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(cons(G1, Fs), Gs), NF))
u'13'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(p(V), Gs)), sequent(Left, Right)) → u'14'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, Gs), sequent(Left, cons(p(V), Right))))
u'14'1(reduce'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, nil), sequent(F1, F2)) → u'15'1(intersect'ii'in(F1, F2))
u'15'1(intersect'ii'out) → reduce'ii'out
tautology'i'in(F) → u'16'1(reduce'ii'in(sequent(nil, cons(F, nil)), sequent(nil, nil)))
u'16'1(reduce'ii'out) → tautology'i'out

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [15] with a polynomial ordering [25], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [17] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.

The following dependency pairs can be deleted:

REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(x'2b(G1, G2), Gs)), NF) → REDUCE'II'IN(sequent(Fs, cons(G1, cons(G2, Gs))), NF)

No rules are removed from R.

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(REDUCE'II'IN(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(sequent(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(x'2b(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + 2·x₁ + x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.