Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpWWC4BN/ExIntrod_Zan97

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FACT(ok(X)) → FACT(X)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ACTIVE(prod(s(X), Y)) → ADD(Y, prod(X, Y))
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(prod(s(X), Y)) → PROD(X, Y)
IF(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(active(X1), X2, X3)
ACTIVE(p(X)) → P(active(X))
ACTIVE(zero(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(active(X1), X2)
PROPER(prod(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(zero(X)) → ZERO(proper(X))
PROPER(fact(X)) → FACT(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → PROD(active(X1), X2)
P(ok(X)) → P(X)
PROPER(fact(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → P(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(p(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
PROPER(zero(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(p(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
PROD(X1, mark(X2)) → PROD(X1, X2)
FACT(mark(X)) → FACT(X)
P(mark(X)) → P(X)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → PROD(X1, active(X2))
PROD(mark(X1), X2) → PROD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → FACT(p(X))
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
ACTIVE(zero(X)) → ZERO(active(X))
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → PROD(X, fact(p(X)))
PROD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PROD(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → ZERO(X)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
PROPER(prod(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → S(0)
PROPER(p(X)) → P(proper(X))
ZERO(ok(X)) → ZERO(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(X1, active(X2))
PROPER(prod(X1, X2)) → PROD(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ZERO(mark(X)) → ZERO(X)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → FACT(active(X))
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → IF(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X))))
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FACT(ok(X)) → FACT(X)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ACTIVE(prod(s(X), Y)) → ADD(Y, prod(X, Y))
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(prod(s(X), Y)) → PROD(X, Y)
IF(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(active(X1), X2, X3)
ACTIVE(p(X)) → P(active(X))
ACTIVE(zero(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(active(X1), X2)
PROPER(prod(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(zero(X)) → ZERO(proper(X))
PROPER(fact(X)) → FACT(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → PROD(active(X1), X2)
P(ok(X)) → P(X)
PROPER(fact(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → P(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(p(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
PROPER(zero(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(p(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
PROD(X1, mark(X2)) → PROD(X1, X2)
FACT(mark(X)) → FACT(X)
P(mark(X)) → P(X)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → PROD(X1, active(X2))
PROD(mark(X1), X2) → PROD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → FACT(p(X))
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
ACTIVE(zero(X)) → ZERO(active(X))
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → PROD(X, fact(p(X)))
PROD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PROD(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → ZERO(X)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
PROPER(prod(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → S(0)
PROPER(p(X)) → P(proper(X))
ZERO(ok(X)) → ZERO(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(X1, active(X2))
PROPER(prod(X1, X2)) → PROD(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ZERO(mark(X)) → ZERO(X)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → FACT(active(X))
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → IF(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X))))
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 10 SCCs with 28 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(ok(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 3 + (4)x_1
POL(ADD(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

P(mark(X)) → P(X)
P(ok(X)) → P(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

P(mark(X)) → P(X)
P(ok(X)) → P(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(P(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PROD(X1, X2)
PROD(X1, mark(X2)) → PROD(X1, X2)
PROD(mark(X1), X2) → PROD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PROD(X1, X2)
PROD(X1, mark(X2)) → PROD(X1, X2)
PROD(mark(X1), X2) → PROD(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(ok(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 3 + (3)x_1
POL(PROD(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(ok(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(S(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ZERO(ok(X)) → ZERO(X)
ZERO(mark(X)) → ZERO(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ZERO(ok(X)) → ZERO(X)
ZERO(mark(X)) → ZERO(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(ZERO(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (2)x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1
POL(IF(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = (4)x_1 + (3)x_2 + x_3

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FACT(ok(X)) → FACT(X)
FACT(mark(X)) → FACT(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FACT(ok(X)) → FACT(X)
FACT(mark(X)) → FACT(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(FACT(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(zero(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(p(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(fact(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(prod(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(prod(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(zero(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(p(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(fact(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(prod(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(prod(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zero(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(prod(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + (4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(PROPER(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + (4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 4 + (4)x_1 + (2)x_2 + (4)x_3
POL(p(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(fact(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(zero(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(p(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(zero(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(fact(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(prod(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(p(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zero(x₁)) = 4 + (3)x_1
POL(prod(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + (4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + (4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 4 + (3)x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(p(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(fact(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(fact(X)) → mark(if(zero(X), s(0), prod(X, fact(p(X)))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(prod(0, X)) → mark(0)
active(prod(s(X), Y)) → mark(add(Y, prod(X, Y)))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(zero(0)) → mark(true)
active(zero(s(X))) → mark(false)
active(p(s(X))) → mark(X)
active(fact(X)) → fact(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(zero(X)) → zero(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(active(X1), X2)
active(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(X1, active(X2))
active(p(X)) → p(active(X))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(X1, active(X2))
fact(mark(X)) → mark(fact(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(mark(X)) → mark(zero(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
prod(mark(X1), X2) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
prod(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(prod(X1, X2))
p(mark(X)) → mark(p(X))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(add(X1, X2))
proper(fact(X)) → fact(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(zero(X)) → zero(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(prod(X1, X2)) → prod(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(p(X)) → p(proper(X))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
fact(ok(X)) → ok(fact(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
zero(ok(X)) → ok(zero(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
prod(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(prod(X1, X2))
p(ok(X)) → ok(p(X))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.