Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.


↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → FILTER(X, sieve(Y))
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
TAIL(active(X)) → TAIL(X)
MARK(head(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
FILTER(active(X1), X2) → FILTER(X1, X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
SIEVE(mark(X)) → SIEVE(X)
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → IF(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
MARK(true) → ACTIVE(true)
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))
MARK(sieve(X)) → ACTIVE(sieve(mark(X)))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
DIVIDES(X1, active(X2)) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
DIVIDES(mark(X1), X2) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(head(X)) → HEAD(mark(X))
ACTIVE(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → CONS(X, filter(X, sieve(Y)))
S(active(X)) → S(X)
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → FILTER(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(tail(X)) → TAIL(mark(X))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(false) → ACTIVE(false)
FILTER(X1, active(X2)) → FILTER(X1, X2)
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
HEAD(active(X)) → HEAD(X)
FILTER(X1, mark(X2)) → FILTER(X1, X2)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
DIVIDES(active(X1), X2) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(primes) → S(0)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(primes) → ACTIVE(primes)
FILTER(mark(X1), X2) → FILTER(X1, X2)
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(from(X)) → FROM(mark(X))
ACTIVE(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → FILTER(X, sieve(Y))
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
SIEVE(active(X)) → SIEVE(X)
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → DIVIDES(s(s(X)), Y)
ACTIVE(primes) → SIEVE(from(s(s(0))))
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → FILTER(s(s(X)), Z)
IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → DIVIDES(mark(X1), mark(X2))
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(primes) → FROM(s(s(0)))
ACTIVE(primes) → S(s(0))
MARK(head(X)) → ACTIVE(head(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → SIEVE(Y)
ACTIVE(primes) → MARK(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(sieve(X)) → SIEVE(mark(X))
DIVIDES(X1, mark(X2)) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → SIEVE(Y)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(head(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(X)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(sieve(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → FILTER(X, sieve(Y))
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
TAIL(active(X)) → TAIL(X)
MARK(head(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
FILTER(active(X1), X2) → FILTER(X1, X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
SIEVE(mark(X)) → SIEVE(X)
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → IF(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
MARK(true) → ACTIVE(true)
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))
MARK(sieve(X)) → ACTIVE(sieve(mark(X)))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
DIVIDES(X1, active(X2)) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
DIVIDES(mark(X1), X2) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(head(X)) → HEAD(mark(X))
ACTIVE(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → CONS(X, filter(X, sieve(Y)))
S(active(X)) → S(X)
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → FILTER(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(tail(X)) → TAIL(mark(X))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(false) → ACTIVE(false)
FILTER(X1, active(X2)) → FILTER(X1, X2)
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
HEAD(active(X)) → HEAD(X)
FILTER(X1, mark(X2)) → FILTER(X1, X2)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
DIVIDES(active(X1), X2) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(primes) → S(0)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(primes) → ACTIVE(primes)
FILTER(mark(X1), X2) → FILTER(X1, X2)
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(from(X)) → FROM(mark(X))
ACTIVE(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → FILTER(X, sieve(Y))
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
SIEVE(active(X)) → SIEVE(X)
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → DIVIDES(s(s(X)), Y)
ACTIVE(primes) → SIEVE(from(s(s(0))))
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → FILTER(s(s(X)), Z)
IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → DIVIDES(mark(X1), mark(X2))
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(primes) → FROM(s(s(0)))
ACTIVE(primes) → S(s(0))
MARK(head(X)) → ACTIVE(head(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → SIEVE(Y)
ACTIVE(primes) → MARK(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(sieve(X)) → SIEVE(mark(X))
DIVIDES(X1, mark(X2)) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → SIEVE(Y)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(head(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(X)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(sieve(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 10 SCCs with 28 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIVIDES(X1, active(X2)) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
DIVIDES(active(X1), X2) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
DIVIDES(mark(X1), X2) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
DIVIDES(X1, mark(X2)) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


DIVIDES(X1, active(X2)) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
DIVIDES(active(X1), X2) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
DIVIDES(mark(X1), X2) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
DIVIDES(X1, mark(X2)) → DIVIDES(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 3 + (4)x_1   
POL(DIVIDES(x1, x2)) = x_1 + (4)x_2   
POL(mark(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FILTER(mark(X1), X2) → FILTER(X1, X2)
FILTER(X1, active(X2)) → FILTER(X1, X2)
FILTER(active(X1), X2) → FILTER(X1, X2)
FILTER(X1, mark(X2)) → FILTER(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


FILTER(mark(X1), X2) → FILTER(X1, X2)
FILTER(X1, active(X2)) → FILTER(X1, X2)
FILTER(active(X1), X2) → FILTER(X1, X2)
FILTER(X1, mark(X2)) → FILTER(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 1 + (4)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 3 + (4)x_1   
POL(FILTER(x1, x2)) = x_1 + (4)x_2   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 3 + (2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + (4)x_1   
POL(IF(x1, x2, x3)) = x_1 + (4)x_2 + x_3   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAIL(active(X)) → TAIL(X)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


TAIL(active(X)) → TAIL(X)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 4 + x_1   
POL(TAIL(x1)) = (4)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)
HEAD(active(X)) → HEAD(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)
HEAD(active(X)) → HEAD(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 4 + x_1   
POL(HEAD(x1)) = (4)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
POL(CONS(x1, x2)) = (4)x_1 + x_2   
POL(mark(x1)) = 3 + (4)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 4 + x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
POL(S(x1)) = (4)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 4 + x_1   
POL(FROM(x1)) = (4)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SIEVE(active(X)) → SIEVE(X)
SIEVE(mark(X)) → SIEVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


SIEVE(active(X)) → SIEVE(X)
SIEVE(mark(X)) → SIEVE(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(SIEVE(x1)) = (4)x_1   
POL(active(x1)) = 4 + x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(primes) → ACTIVE(primes)
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
MARK(head(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
MARK(sieve(X)) → ACTIVE(sieve(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(head(X)) → ACTIVE(head(mark(X)))
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(primes) → MARK(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(head(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(X)
MARK(sieve(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(primes) → ACTIVE(primes)
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
MARK(head(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
MARK(sieve(X)) → ACTIVE(sieve(mark(X)))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(head(X)) → ACTIVE(head(mark(X)))
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(primes) → MARK(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(head(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(X)
MARK(sieve(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(Y)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(from(x1)) = 1   
POL(tail(x1)) = 1   
POL(true) = 2   
POL(head(x1)) = 1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 0   
POL(0) = 1   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(primes) = 1   
POL(active(x1)) = 3 + x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 2   
POL(if(x1, x2, x3)) = 1   
POL(filter(x1, x2)) = 1   
POL(false) = 1   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(divides(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(sieve(x1)) = 1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(primes) → ACTIVE(primes)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(head(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
MARK(sieve(X)) → ACTIVE(sieve(mark(X)))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(head(X)) → ACTIVE(head(mark(X)))
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(primes) → MARK(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
MARK(filter(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
MARK(divides(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(head(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(X)
MARK(sieve(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
mark(primes) → active(primes)
mark(sieve(X)) → active(sieve(mark(X)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(head(X)) → active(head(mark(X)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(filter(X1, X2)) → active(filter(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(divides(X1, X2)) → active(divides(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
sieve(mark(X)) → sieve(X)
sieve(active(X)) → sieve(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
head(mark(X)) → head(X)
head(active(X)) → head(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
filter(mark(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(active(X1), X2) → filter(X1, X2)
filter(X1, active(X2)) → filter(X1, X2)
divides(mark(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(active(X1), X2) → divides(X1, X2)
divides(X1, active(X2)) → divides(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.