Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpGBKpCn/Ex1_Luc04b

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(nats) → CONS(0, incr(nats))
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(active(X1), X2)
INCR(ok(X)) → INCR(X)
PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)
PROPER(incr(X)) → INCR(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(nats) → INCR(nats)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
TAIL(ok(X)) → TAIL(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → TAIL(active(X))
ACTIVE(odds) → INCR(pairs)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → S(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → INCR(XS)
PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → INCR(active(X))
INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(pairs) → INCR(odds)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(pairs) → CONS(0, incr(odds))
PROPER(head(X)) → HEAD(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
PROPER(tail(X)) → TAIL(proper(X))
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → CONS(s(X), incr(XS))
ACTIVE(head(X)) → HEAD(active(X))
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
HEAD(ok(X)) → HEAD(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(nats) → CONS(0, incr(nats))
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(active(X1), X2)
INCR(ok(X)) → INCR(X)
PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)
PROPER(incr(X)) → INCR(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(nats) → INCR(nats)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
TAIL(ok(X)) → TAIL(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → TAIL(active(X))
ACTIVE(odds) → INCR(pairs)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → S(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → INCR(XS)
PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → INCR(active(X))
INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(pairs) → INCR(odds)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(pairs) → CONS(0, incr(odds))
PROPER(head(X)) → HEAD(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
PROPER(tail(X)) → TAIL(proper(X))
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → CONS(s(X), incr(XS))
ACTIVE(head(X)) → HEAD(active(X))
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
HEAD(ok(X)) → HEAD(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 8 SCCs with 20 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAIL(ok(X)) → TAIL(X)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TAIL(ok(X)) → TAIL(X)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(ok(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(TAIL(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)
HEAD(ok(X)) → HEAD(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)
HEAD(ok(X)) → HEAD(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(HEAD(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(ok(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(S(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
INCR(ok(X)) → INCR(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
INCR(ok(X)) → INCR(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(INCR(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(CONS(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (2)x_1
POL(ok(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 5.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(PROPER(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(tail(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(incr(x₁)) = 2 + x_1
POL(head(x₁)) = 2 + (4)x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = 2 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 4 + (2)x_1
POL(tail(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(incr(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(head(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(s(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(nats) → mark(cons(0, incr(nats)))
active(pairs) → mark(cons(0, incr(odds)))
active(odds) → mark(incr(pairs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(head(cons(X, XS))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(pairs) → ok(pairs)
proper(odds) → ok(odds)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.