Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gt(s(x), 0) → true
gt(0, y) → false
gt(s(x), s(y)) → gt(x, y)
divides(x, y) → div(x, y, y)
div(0, 0, z) → true
div(0, s(x), z) → false
div(s(x), 0, s(z)) → div(s(x), s(z), s(z))
div(s(x), s(y), z) → div(x, y, z)
prime(x) → test(x, s(s(0)))
test(x, y) → if1(gt(x, y), x, y)
if1(true, x, y) → if2(divides(x, y), x, y)
if1(false, x, y) → true
if2(true, x, y) → false
if2(false, x, y) → test(x, s(y))

Q is empty.


↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gt(s(x), 0) → true
gt(0, y) → false
gt(s(x), s(y)) → gt(x, y)
divides(x, y) → div(x, y, y)
div(0, 0, z) → true
div(0, s(x), z) → false
div(s(x), 0, s(z)) → div(s(x), s(z), s(z))
div(s(x), s(y), z) → div(x, y, z)
prime(x) → test(x, s(s(0)))
test(x, y) → if1(gt(x, y), x, y)
if1(true, x, y) → if2(divides(x, y), x, y)
if1(false, x, y) → true
if2(true, x, y) → false
if2(false, x, y) → test(x, s(y))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIV(s(x), 0, s(z)) → DIV(s(x), s(z), s(z))
DIVIDES(x, y) → DIV(x, y, y)
TEST(x, y) → IF1(gt(x, y), x, y)
GT(s(x), s(y)) → GT(x, y)
TEST(x, y) → GT(x, y)
DIV(s(x), s(y), z) → DIV(x, y, z)
IF1(true, x, y) → DIVIDES(x, y)
PRIME(x) → TEST(x, s(s(0)))
IF1(true, x, y) → IF2(divides(x, y), x, y)
IF2(false, x, y) → TEST(x, s(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gt(s(x), 0) → true
gt(0, y) → false
gt(s(x), s(y)) → gt(x, y)
divides(x, y) → div(x, y, y)
div(0, 0, z) → true
div(0, s(x), z) → false
div(s(x), 0, s(z)) → div(s(x), s(z), s(z))
div(s(x), s(y), z) → div(x, y, z)
prime(x) → test(x, s(s(0)))
test(x, y) → if1(gt(x, y), x, y)
if1(true, x, y) → if2(divides(x, y), x, y)
if1(false, x, y) → true
if2(true, x, y) → false
if2(false, x, y) → test(x, s(y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIV(s(x), 0, s(z)) → DIV(s(x), s(z), s(z))
DIVIDES(x, y) → DIV(x, y, y)
TEST(x, y) → IF1(gt(x, y), x, y)
GT(s(x), s(y)) → GT(x, y)
TEST(x, y) → GT(x, y)
DIV(s(x), s(y), z) → DIV(x, y, z)
IF1(true, x, y) → DIVIDES(x, y)
PRIME(x) → TEST(x, s(s(0)))
IF1(true, x, y) → IF2(divides(x, y), x, y)
IF2(false, x, y) → TEST(x, s(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gt(s(x), 0) → true
gt(0, y) → false
gt(s(x), s(y)) → gt(x, y)
divides(x, y) → div(x, y, y)
div(0, 0, z) → true
div(0, s(x), z) → false
div(s(x), 0, s(z)) → div(s(x), s(z), s(z))
div(s(x), s(y), z) → div(x, y, z)
prime(x) → test(x, s(s(0)))
test(x, y) → if1(gt(x, y), x, y)
if1(true, x, y) → if2(divides(x, y), x, y)
if1(false, x, y) → true
if2(true, x, y) → false
if2(false, x, y) → test(x, s(y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 3 SCCs with 4 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIV(s(x), 0, s(z)) → DIV(s(x), s(z), s(z))
DIV(s(x), s(y), z) → DIV(x, y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gt(s(x), 0) → true
gt(0, y) → false
gt(s(x), s(y)) → gt(x, y)
divides(x, y) → div(x, y, y)
div(0, 0, z) → true
div(0, s(x), z) → false
div(s(x), 0, s(z)) → div(s(x), s(z), s(z))
div(s(x), s(y), z) → div(x, y, z)
prime(x) → test(x, s(s(0)))
test(x, y) → if1(gt(x, y), x, y)
if1(true, x, y) → if2(divides(x, y), x, y)
if1(false, x, y) → true
if2(true, x, y) → false
if2(false, x, y) → test(x, s(y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


DIV(s(x), s(y), z) → DIV(x, y, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

DIV(s(x), 0, s(z)) → DIV(s(x), s(z), s(z))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(DIV(x1, x2, x3)) = (4)x_1   
POL(s(x1)) = 4 + x_1   
POL(0) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ DependencyGraphProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIV(s(x), 0, s(z)) → DIV(s(x), s(z), s(z))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gt(s(x), 0) → true
gt(0, y) → false
gt(s(x), s(y)) → gt(x, y)
divides(x, y) → div(x, y, y)
div(0, 0, z) → true
div(0, s(x), z) → false
div(s(x), 0, s(z)) → div(s(x), s(z), s(z))
div(s(x), s(y), z) → div(x, y, z)
prime(x) → test(x, s(s(0)))
test(x, y) → if1(gt(x, y), x, y)
if1(true, x, y) → if2(divides(x, y), x, y)
if1(false, x, y) → true
if2(true, x, y) → false
if2(false, x, y) → test(x, s(y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GT(s(x), s(y)) → GT(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gt(s(x), 0) → true
gt(0, y) → false
gt(s(x), s(y)) → gt(x, y)
divides(x, y) → div(x, y, y)
div(0, 0, z) → true
div(0, s(x), z) → false
div(s(x), 0, s(z)) → div(s(x), s(z), s(z))
div(s(x), s(y), z) → div(x, y, z)
prime(x) → test(x, s(s(0)))
test(x, y) → if1(gt(x, y), x, y)
if1(true, x, y) → if2(divides(x, y), x, y)
if1(false, x, y) → true
if2(true, x, y) → false
if2(false, x, y) → test(x, s(y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


GT(s(x), s(y)) → GT(x, y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(s(x1)) = 4 + (2)x_1   
POL(GT(x1, x2)) = (3)x_2   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 12.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gt(s(x), 0) → true
gt(0, y) → false
gt(s(x), s(y)) → gt(x, y)
divides(x, y) → div(x, y, y)
div(0, 0, z) → true
div(0, s(x), z) → false
div(s(x), 0, s(z)) → div(s(x), s(z), s(z))
div(s(x), s(y), z) → div(x, y, z)
prime(x) → test(x, s(s(0)))
test(x, y) → if1(gt(x, y), x, y)
if1(true, x, y) → if2(divides(x, y), x, y)
if1(false, x, y) → true
if2(true, x, y) → false
if2(false, x, y) → test(x, s(y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TEST(x, y) → IF1(gt(x, y), x, y)
IF1(true, x, y) → IF2(divides(x, y), x, y)
IF2(false, x, y) → TEST(x, s(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gt(s(x), 0) → true
gt(0, y) → false
gt(s(x), s(y)) → gt(x, y)
divides(x, y) → div(x, y, y)
div(0, 0, z) → true
div(0, s(x), z) → false
div(s(x), 0, s(z)) → div(s(x), s(z), s(z))
div(s(x), s(y), z) → div(x, y, z)
prime(x) → test(x, s(s(0)))
test(x, y) → if1(gt(x, y), x, y)
if1(true, x, y) → if2(divides(x, y), x, y)
if1(false, x, y) → true
if2(true, x, y) → false
if2(false, x, y) → test(x, s(y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.