Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpj0fv8r/otto01.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → MIN(len(xs), len(ys))
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → SUM(take(c, xs), take(c, ys))
ADDLIST(x, y) → IF(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
ADDLIST(x, y) → LEN(x)
MIN(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)
LEN(cons(x, xs)) → LEN(xs)
TAKE(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → TAKE(x, ys)
ADDLIST(x, y) → MIN(len(x), len(y))
ADDLIST(x, y) → LEN(y)
LE(s(x), s(y)) → LE(x, y)
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → TAKE(c, ys)
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → IF(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))
SUM(x, s(y)) → SUM(x, y)
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → LEN(xs)
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → TAKE(c, xs)
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → LEN(ys)
ADDLIST(x, y) → LE(0, min(len(x), len(y)))
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → LE(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → MIN(len(xs), len(ys))
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → SUM(take(c, xs), take(c, ys))
ADDLIST(x, y) → IF(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
ADDLIST(x, y) → LEN(x)
MIN(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)
LEN(cons(x, xs)) → LEN(xs)
TAKE(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → TAKE(x, ys)
ADDLIST(x, y) → MIN(len(x), len(y))
ADDLIST(x, y) → LEN(y)
LE(s(x), s(y)) → LE(x, y)
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → TAKE(c, ys)
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → IF(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))
SUM(x, s(y)) → SUM(x, y)
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → LEN(xs)
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → TAKE(c, xs)
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → LEN(ys)
ADDLIST(x, y) → LE(0, min(len(x), len(y)))
IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → LE(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 6 SCCs with 12 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAKE(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → TAKE(x, ys)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TAKE(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → TAKE(x, ys)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(TAKE(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + (3)x_2
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_2
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE(s(x), s(y)) → LE(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LE(s(x), s(y)) → LE(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1
POL(LE(x₁, x₂)) = (3)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SUM(x, s(y)) → SUM(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

SUM(x, s(y)) → SUM(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(SUM(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_2
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LEN(cons(x, xs)) → LEN(xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LEN(cons(x, xs)) → LEN(xs)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + (4)x_2
POL(LEN(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MIN(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MIN(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(MIN(x₁, x₂)) = (3)x_2
POL(s(x₁)) = 4 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 12.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(true, c, xs, ys, z) → IF(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(s(x), 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → min(x, y)
len(nil) → 0
len(cons(x, xs)) → s(len(xs))
sum(x, 0) → x
sum(x, s(y)) → s(sum(x, y))
le(0, x) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
take(0, cons(y, ys)) → y
take(s(x), cons(y, ys)) → take(x, ys)
addList(x, y) → if(le(0, min(len(x), len(y))), 0, x, y, nil)
if(false, c, x, y, z) → z
if(true, c, xs, ys, z) → if(le(s(c), min(len(xs), len(ys))), s(c), xs, ys, cons(sum(take(c, xs), take(c, ys)), z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.