Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
backslash(x, x) → e
/(x, x) → e
.(e, x) → x
.(x, e) → x
backslash(e, x) → x
/(x, e) → x
.(x, backslash(x, y)) → y
.(/(y, x), x) → y
backslash(x, .(x, y)) → y
/(.(y, x), x) → y
/(x, backslash(y, x)) → y
backslash(/(x, y), x) → y
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
backslash(x, x) → e
/(x, x) → e
.(e, x) → x
.(x, e) → x
backslash(e, x) → x
/(x, e) → x
.(x, backslash(x, y)) → y
.(/(y, x), x) → y
backslash(x, .(x, y)) → y
/(.(y, x), x) → y
/(x, backslash(y, x)) → y
backslash(/(x, y), x) → y
Q is empty.
The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
backslash(x, x) → e
/(x, x) → e
.(e, x) → x
.(x, e) → x
backslash(e, x) → x
/(x, e) → x
.(x, backslash(x, y)) → y
.(/(y, x), x) → y
backslash(x, .(x, y)) → y
/(.(y, x), x) → y
/(x, backslash(y, x)) → y
backslash(/(x, y), x) → y
Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:
.(e, x) → x
.(x, e) → x
backslash(e, x) → x
/(x, e) → x
.(x, backslash(x, y)) → y
.(/(y, x), x) → y
backslash(x, .(x, y)) → y
/(.(y, x), x) → y
/(x, backslash(y, x)) → y
backslash(/(x, y), x) → y
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(.(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + 2·x2
POL(/(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(backslash(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(e) = 1
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
backslash(x, x) → e
/(x, x) → e
Q is empty.
The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
backslash(x, x) → e
/(x, x) → e
Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:
backslash(x, x) → e
/(x, x) → e
Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(/(x1, x2)) = 2 + x1 + x2
POL(backslash(x1, x2)) = 2 + x1 + x2
POL(e) = 1
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof
↳ QTRS
↳ RisEmptyProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.