Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x1)) → a(a(a(x1)))
b(a(b(x1))) → a(x1)
b(a(a(x1))) → b(a(b(x1)))

Q is empty.


QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x1)) → a(a(a(x1)))
b(a(b(x1))) → a(x1)
b(a(a(x1))) → b(a(b(x1)))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B(a(a(x1))) → B(a(b(x1)))
B(a(a(x1))) → B(x1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x1)) → a(a(a(x1)))
b(a(b(x1))) → a(x1)
b(a(a(x1))) → b(a(b(x1)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
QDP
      ↳ Narrowing
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B(a(a(x1))) → B(a(b(x1)))
B(a(a(x1))) → B(x1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x1)) → a(a(a(x1)))
b(a(b(x1))) → a(x1)
b(a(a(x1))) → b(a(b(x1)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule B(a(a(x1))) → B(a(b(x1))) at position [0,0] we obtained the following new rules:

B(a(a(a(a(x0))))) → B(a(b(a(b(x0)))))
B(a(a(b(x0)))) → B(a(a(a(a(x0)))))
B(a(a(a(b(x0))))) → B(a(a(x0)))



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ Narrowing
QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B(a(a(b(x0)))) → B(a(a(a(a(x0)))))
B(a(a(a(a(x0))))) → B(a(b(a(b(x0)))))
B(a(a(x1))) → B(x1)
B(a(a(a(b(x0))))) → B(a(a(x0)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x1)) → a(a(a(x1)))
b(a(b(x1))) → a(x1)
b(a(a(x1))) → b(a(b(x1)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The finiteness of this DP problem is implied by strong termination of a SRS due to [12].


↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ Narrowing
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x1)) → a(a(a(x1)))
b(a(b(x1))) → a(x1)
b(a(a(x1))) → b(a(b(x1)))
B(a(a(b(x0)))) → B(a(a(a(a(x0)))))
B(a(a(a(a(x0))))) → B(a(b(a(b(x0)))))
B(a(a(x1))) → B(x1)
B(a(a(a(b(x0))))) → B(a(a(x0)))

Q is empty.

We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

b(b(x1)) → a(a(a(x1)))
b(a(b(x1))) → a(x1)
b(a(a(x1))) → b(a(b(x1)))
B(a(a(b(x0)))) → B(a(a(a(a(x0)))))
B(a(a(a(a(x0))))) → B(a(b(a(b(x0)))))
B(a(a(x1))) → B(x1)
B(a(a(a(b(x0))))) → B(a(a(x0)))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
b(a(a(B(x)))) → a(a(a(a(B(x)))))
a(a(a(a(B(x))))) → b(a(b(a(B(x)))))
a(a(B(x))) → B(x)
b(a(a(a(B(x))))) → a(a(B(x)))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ Narrowing
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
b(a(a(B(x)))) → a(a(a(a(B(x)))))
a(a(a(a(B(x))))) → b(a(b(a(B(x)))))
a(a(B(x))) → B(x)
b(a(a(a(B(x))))) → a(a(B(x)))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B1(a(b(x))) → A(x)
A(a(a(a(B(x))))) → B1(a(B(x)))
B1(b(x)) → A(a(x))
A(a(b(x))) → B1(a(b(x)))
A(a(a(a(B(x))))) → B1(a(b(a(B(x)))))
B1(b(x)) → A(x)
A(a(a(a(B(x))))) → A(b(a(B(x))))
B1(a(a(B(x)))) → A(a(a(a(B(x)))))
B1(a(a(B(x)))) → A(a(a(B(x))))
B1(b(x)) → A(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
b(a(a(B(x)))) → a(a(a(a(B(x)))))
a(a(a(a(B(x))))) → b(a(b(a(B(x)))))
a(a(B(x))) → B(x)
b(a(a(a(B(x))))) → a(a(B(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ Narrowing
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
QDP
                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B1(a(b(x))) → A(x)
A(a(a(a(B(x))))) → B1(a(B(x)))
B1(b(x)) → A(a(x))
A(a(b(x))) → B1(a(b(x)))
A(a(a(a(B(x))))) → B1(a(b(a(B(x)))))
B1(b(x)) → A(x)
A(a(a(a(B(x))))) → A(b(a(B(x))))
B1(a(a(B(x)))) → A(a(a(a(B(x)))))
B1(a(a(B(x)))) → A(a(a(B(x))))
B1(b(x)) → A(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
b(a(a(B(x)))) → a(a(a(a(B(x)))))
a(a(a(a(B(x))))) → b(a(b(a(B(x)))))
a(a(B(x))) → B(x)
b(a(a(a(B(x))))) → a(a(B(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ Narrowing
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                    ↳ QDP
                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
QDP
                          ↳ Narrowing
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B1(a(b(x))) → A(x)
B1(b(x)) → A(a(x))
A(a(b(x))) → B1(a(b(x)))
A(a(a(a(B(x))))) → B1(a(b(a(B(x)))))
B1(b(x)) → A(x)
B1(a(a(B(x)))) → A(a(a(a(B(x)))))
B1(a(a(B(x)))) → A(a(a(B(x))))
B1(b(x)) → A(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
b(a(a(B(x)))) → a(a(a(a(B(x)))))
a(a(a(a(B(x))))) → b(a(b(a(B(x)))))
a(a(B(x))) → B(x)
b(a(a(a(B(x))))) → a(a(B(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule B1(a(a(B(x)))) → A(a(a(B(x)))) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:

B1(a(a(B(x0)))) → A(B(x0))



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ Narrowing
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                    ↳ QDP
                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ Narrowing
QDP
                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B1(a(b(x))) → A(x)
B1(b(x)) → A(a(x))
A(a(b(x))) → B1(a(b(x)))
A(a(a(a(B(x))))) → B1(a(b(a(B(x)))))
B1(b(x)) → A(x)
B1(a(a(B(x)))) → A(a(a(a(B(x)))))
B1(a(a(B(x0)))) → A(B(x0))
B1(b(x)) → A(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
b(a(a(B(x)))) → a(a(a(a(B(x)))))
a(a(a(a(B(x))))) → b(a(b(a(B(x)))))
a(a(B(x))) → B(x)
b(a(a(a(B(x))))) → a(a(B(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ Narrowing
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                    ↳ QDP
                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ Narrowing
                            ↳ QDP
                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof
QDP
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

B1(a(b(x))) → A(x)
B1(b(x)) → A(a(x))
A(a(b(x))) → B1(a(b(x)))
A(a(a(a(B(x))))) → B1(a(b(a(B(x)))))
B1(b(x)) → A(x)
B1(a(a(B(x)))) → A(a(a(a(B(x)))))
B1(b(x)) → A(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
b(a(a(B(x)))) → a(a(a(a(B(x)))))
a(a(a(a(B(x))))) → b(a(b(a(B(x)))))
a(a(B(x))) → B(x)
b(a(a(a(B(x))))) → a(a(B(x)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
b(a(a(B(x)))) → a(a(a(a(B(x)))))
a(a(a(a(B(x))))) → b(a(b(a(B(x)))))
a(a(B(x))) → B(x)
b(a(a(a(B(x))))) → a(a(B(x)))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
b(a(a(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
B(a(a(b(x)))) → B(a(a(a(a(x)))))
B(a(a(a(a(x))))) → B(a(b(a(b(x)))))
B(a(a(x))) → B(x)
B(a(a(a(b(x))))) → B(a(a(x)))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ Narrowing
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
b(a(a(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
B(a(a(b(x)))) → B(a(a(a(a(x)))))
B(a(a(a(a(x))))) → B(a(b(a(b(x)))))
B(a(a(x))) → B(x)
B(a(a(a(b(x))))) → B(a(a(x)))

Q is empty.

We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
b(a(a(B(x)))) → a(a(a(a(B(x)))))
a(a(a(a(B(x))))) → b(a(b(a(B(x)))))
a(a(B(x))) → B(x)
b(a(a(a(B(x))))) → a(a(B(x)))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
b(a(a(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
B(a(a(b(x)))) → B(a(a(a(a(x)))))
B(a(a(a(a(x))))) → B(a(b(a(b(x)))))
B(a(a(x))) → B(x)
B(a(a(a(b(x))))) → B(a(a(x)))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ Narrowing
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
b(a(a(x))) → b(a(b(x)))
B(a(a(b(x)))) → B(a(a(a(a(x)))))
B(a(a(a(a(x))))) → B(a(b(a(b(x)))))
B(a(a(x))) → B(x)
B(a(a(a(b(x))))) → B(a(a(x)))

Q is empty.

We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

b(b(x1)) → a(a(a(x1)))
b(a(b(x1))) → a(x1)
b(a(a(x1))) → b(a(b(x1)))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))

Q is empty.

We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

b(b(x1)) → a(a(a(x1)))
b(a(b(x1))) → a(x1)
b(a(a(x1))) → b(a(b(x1)))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(b(x)) → a(a(a(x)))
b(a(b(x))) → a(x)
a(a(b(x))) → b(a(b(x)))

Q is empty.