(1) NonTerminationProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure:
a b c b c c a c c → c c c c a c c b c c a a b c b c c a c c a a a a
a b c b c c a c c →
c c c c a c c b c c a a b c b c c a c c a a a aby OverlapClosure OC 2
a b c b c c a c → c c c c a c c b c c a a b c b c c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b c b c c a → c c c c a c c b c c a a b c b a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b c b c c a → c c c c a c c b c c a a a a c b a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b c b c c a → c c c c a c c b a b c c b a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b c b c c → c c c c a c c b a b c c b a a
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b c b c → c c c c a c c b a b a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b c b c → c c c c a a b c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b c b c → c c c c a a a a c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b c b c → c c a b c c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b c → c c a b a
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b c → c c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a a → b
by original rule (OC 1)
a b c → c c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b c → c c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a a → b
by original rule (OC 1)
a b c → c c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a a → b
by original rule (OC 1)
a b c a → c c b a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b c a → c c a a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b c → c c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a a → b
by original rule (OC 1)
a a → b
by original rule (OC 1)
a b c → c c b a a
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b c → c c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a a → b
by original rule (OC 1)
a a → b
by original rule (OC 1)
a b c → c c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a a → b
by original rule (OC 1)
a b c → c c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b c → c c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a a → b
by original rule (OC 1)
a b c → c c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)