(1) NonTerminationProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure:
a b b b b b b b b → b b b a b b b b b b b b c c c
a b b b b b b b b →
b b b a b b b b b b b b c c cby OverlapClosure OC 3
a b b b b b b b b → b b b a c b b b b b b b b b c c c
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b b b b b b b b → b b b a c b b b b b b b b b a c c c
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b b → b b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)
a b b b b b b → b b b b b b b b b a c c c
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b b b b b b → b b b b b b a b b c c
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b b b b b b → b b b a b b b b b c c
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b b b b b b → b b b a c b b b b b b c c
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b b b b b b → b b b a c b b b b b b a c c
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b b → b b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)
a b b b b → b b b b b b a c c
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b b b b → b b b a b b c
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b b b b → b b b a c b b b c
by OverlapClosure OC 3a b b b b → b b b a c b b b a c
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b b → b b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)
a b b → b b b a c
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b b → b b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)
a →
by original rule (OC 1)
a →
by original rule (OC 1)
c b →
by original rule (OC 1)
a b b → b b b a c
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b b → b b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)
a →
by original rule (OC 1)
a →
by original rule (OC 1)
c b →
by original rule (OC 1)
a b b b → b b b a
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b b → b b b a c
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b b → b b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)
a →
by original rule (OC 1)
c b →
by original rule (OC 1)
a b b → b b b a c
by OverlapClosure OC 2a b b → b b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)
a →
by original rule (OC 1)
a →
by original rule (OC 1)
c b →
by original rule (OC 1)