(0) Obligation:
Clauses:
flat(niltree, nil).
flat(tree(X, niltree, T), cons(X, Xs)) :- flat(T, Xs).
flat(tree(X, tree(Y, T1, T2), T3), Xs) :- flat(tree(Y, T1, tree(X, T2, T3)), Xs).
Query: flat(g,a)
(1) PrologToPiTRSViaGraphTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)
Transformed Prolog program to (Pi-)TRS.
(2) Obligation:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
flatA_in_ga(niltree, nil) → flatA_out_ga(niltree, nil)
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, niltree), cons(T9, nil)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, niltree), cons(T9, nil))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28))) → U1_ga(T9, T25, T26, T28, flatA_in_ga(T26, T28))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59)) → U2_ga(T9, T53, T54, T55, T56, T57, T59, flatA_in_ga(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99)) → U3_ga(T95, T94, T96, T97, T99, flatA_in_ga(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124) → U4_ga(T120, T116, T117, T118, T119, T121, T122, T124, flatA_in_ga(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124))
U4_ga(T120, T116, T117, T118, T119, T121, T122, T124, flatA_out_ga(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124)
U3_ga(T95, T94, T96, T97, T99, flatA_out_ga(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99))
U2_ga(T9, T53, T54, T55, T56, T57, T59, flatA_out_ga(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59))
U1_ga(T9, T25, T26, T28, flatA_out_ga(T26, T28)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28)))
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
flatA_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
flatA_in_ga(
x1)
niltree =
niltree
flatA_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
flatA_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
tree(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
tree(
x1,
x2,
x3)
U1_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8) =
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x8)
U3_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6) =
U3_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x6)
U4_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8,
x9) =
U4_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x9)
cons(
x1,
x2) =
cons(
x1,
x2)
(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28))) → U1_GA(T9, T25, T26, T28, flatA_in_ga(T26, T28))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28))) → FLATA_IN_GA(T26, T28)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59)) → U2_GA(T9, T53, T54, T55, T56, T57, T59, flatA_in_ga(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99)) → U3_GA(T95, T94, T96, T97, T99, flatA_in_ga(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124) → U4_GA(T120, T116, T117, T118, T119, T121, T122, T124, flatA_in_ga(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
flatA_in_ga(niltree, nil) → flatA_out_ga(niltree, nil)
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, niltree), cons(T9, nil)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, niltree), cons(T9, nil))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28))) → U1_ga(T9, T25, T26, T28, flatA_in_ga(T26, T28))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59)) → U2_ga(T9, T53, T54, T55, T56, T57, T59, flatA_in_ga(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99)) → U3_ga(T95, T94, T96, T97, T99, flatA_in_ga(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124) → U4_ga(T120, T116, T117, T118, T119, T121, T122, T124, flatA_in_ga(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124))
U4_ga(T120, T116, T117, T118, T119, T121, T122, T124, flatA_out_ga(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124)
U3_ga(T95, T94, T96, T97, T99, flatA_out_ga(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99))
U2_ga(T9, T53, T54, T55, T56, T57, T59, flatA_out_ga(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59))
U1_ga(T9, T25, T26, T28, flatA_out_ga(T26, T28)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28)))
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
flatA_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
flatA_in_ga(
x1)
niltree =
niltree
flatA_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
flatA_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
tree(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
tree(
x1,
x2,
x3)
U1_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8) =
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x8)
U3_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6) =
U3_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x6)
U4_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8,
x9) =
U4_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x9)
cons(
x1,
x2) =
cons(
x1,
x2)
FLATA_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
FLATA_IN_GA(
x1)
U1_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U2_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8) =
U2_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x8)
U3_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6) =
U3_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x6)
U4_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8,
x9) =
U4_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x9)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(4) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28))) → U1_GA(T9, T25, T26, T28, flatA_in_ga(T26, T28))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28))) → FLATA_IN_GA(T26, T28)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59)) → U2_GA(T9, T53, T54, T55, T56, T57, T59, flatA_in_ga(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99)) → U3_GA(T95, T94, T96, T97, T99, flatA_in_ga(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124) → U4_GA(T120, T116, T117, T118, T119, T121, T122, T124, flatA_in_ga(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
flatA_in_ga(niltree, nil) → flatA_out_ga(niltree, nil)
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, niltree), cons(T9, nil)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, niltree), cons(T9, nil))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28))) → U1_ga(T9, T25, T26, T28, flatA_in_ga(T26, T28))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59)) → U2_ga(T9, T53, T54, T55, T56, T57, T59, flatA_in_ga(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99)) → U3_ga(T95, T94, T96, T97, T99, flatA_in_ga(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124) → U4_ga(T120, T116, T117, T118, T119, T121, T122, T124, flatA_in_ga(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124))
U4_ga(T120, T116, T117, T118, T119, T121, T122, T124, flatA_out_ga(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124)
U3_ga(T95, T94, T96, T97, T99, flatA_out_ga(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99))
U2_ga(T9, T53, T54, T55, T56, T57, T59, flatA_out_ga(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59))
U1_ga(T9, T25, T26, T28, flatA_out_ga(T26, T28)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28)))
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
flatA_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
flatA_in_ga(
x1)
niltree =
niltree
flatA_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
flatA_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
tree(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
tree(
x1,
x2,
x3)
U1_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8) =
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x8)
U3_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6) =
U3_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x6)
U4_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8,
x9) =
U4_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x9)
cons(
x1,
x2) =
cons(
x1,
x2)
FLATA_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
FLATA_IN_GA(
x1)
U1_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U2_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8) =
U2_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x8)
U3_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6) =
U3_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x6)
U4_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8,
x9) =
U4_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x9)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 1 SCC with 4 less nodes.
(6) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28))) → FLATA_IN_GA(T26, T28)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
flatA_in_ga(niltree, nil) → flatA_out_ga(niltree, nil)
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, niltree), cons(T9, nil)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, niltree), cons(T9, nil))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28))) → U1_ga(T9, T25, T26, T28, flatA_in_ga(T26, T28))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59)) → U2_ga(T9, T53, T54, T55, T56, T57, T59, flatA_in_ga(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99)) → U3_ga(T95, T94, T96, T97, T99, flatA_in_ga(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99))
flatA_in_ga(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124) → U4_ga(T120, T116, T117, T118, T119, T121, T122, T124, flatA_in_ga(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124))
U4_ga(T120, T116, T117, T118, T119, T121, T122, T124, flatA_out_ga(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124)
U3_ga(T95, T94, T96, T97, T99, flatA_out_ga(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99))
U2_ga(T9, T53, T54, T55, T56, T57, T59, flatA_out_ga(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59))
U1_ga(T9, T25, T26, T28, flatA_out_ga(T26, T28)) → flatA_out_ga(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28)))
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
flatA_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
flatA_in_ga(
x1)
niltree =
niltree
flatA_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
flatA_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
tree(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
tree(
x1,
x2,
x3)
U1_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8) =
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x8)
U3_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6) =
U3_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x6)
U4_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x8,
x9) =
U4_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5,
x6,
x7,
x9)
cons(
x1,
x2) =
cons(
x1,
x2)
FLATA_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
FLATA_IN_GA(
x1)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(7) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.
(8) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57)), cons(T9, T59)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)), T59)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26)), cons(T9, cons(T25, T28))) → FLATA_IN_GA(T26, T28)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97), cons(T94, T99)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, T96, T97), T99)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122), T124) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))), T124)
R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
niltree =
niltree
tree(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
tree(
x1,
x2,
x3)
cons(
x1,
x2) =
cons(
x1,
x2)
FLATA_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
FLATA_IN_GA(
x1)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(9) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.
(10) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57))) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26))) → FLATA_IN_GA(T26)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, T96, T97))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))))
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
(11) UsableRulesReductionPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with a polynomial ordering [POLO], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [FROCOS05] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.
The following dependency pairs can be deleted:
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T53, tree(T54, T55, T56), T57))) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T54, T55, tree(T53, T56, T57)))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T9, niltree, tree(T25, niltree, T26))) → FLATA_IN_GA(T26)
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, tree(T94, niltree, T96), T97)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T95, T96, T97))
FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T120, tree(T116, tree(T117, T118, T119), T121), T122)) → FLATA_IN_GA(tree(T117, T118, tree(T116, T119, tree(T120, T121, T122))))
No rules are removed from R.
Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(FLATA_IN_GA(x1)) = 2·x1
POL(niltree) = 0
POL(tree(x1, x2, x3)) = 2 + 2·x1 + 2·x2 + x3
(12) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
(13) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(14) YES