(0) Obligation:

Clauses:

gopher(nil, nil).
gopher(cons(nil, Y), cons(nil, Y)).
gopher(cons(cons(U, V), W), X) :- gopher(cons(U, cons(V, W)), X).
samefringe(nil, nil).
samefringe(cons(U, V), cons(X, Y)) :- ','(gopher(cons(U, V), cons(U1, V1)), ','(gopher(cons(X, Y), cons(X1, Y1)), samefringe(V1, Y1))).

Query: samefringe(g,g)

(1) PrologToPiTRSViaGraphTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)

Transformed Prolog program to (Pi-)TRS.

(2) Obligation:

Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

samefringeA_in_gg(nil, nil) → samefringeA_out_gg(nil, nil)
samefringeA_in_gg(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → U1_gg(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17))
pB_in_ggaaggaa(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U3_ggaaggaa(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15))
pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15) → U5_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_in_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17))
gopherC_in_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22) → gopherC_out_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22)
gopherC_in_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_in_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45))
U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_out_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)) → gopherC_out_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45)
U5_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → U6_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_in_gg(T15, T17))
U6_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_out_gg(T15, T17)) → pD_out_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15)
U3_ggaaggaa(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_out_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15)) → pB_out_ggaaggaa(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17)
pB_in_ggaaggaa(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U4_ggaaggaa(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17))
U4_ggaaggaa(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_out_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)) → pB_out_ggaaggaa(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)
U1_gg(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_out_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17)) → samefringeA_out_gg(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
samefringeA_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  samefringeA_in_gg(x1, x2)
nil  =  nil
samefringeA_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  samefringeA_out_gg(x1, x2)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
U1_gg(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_gg(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
pB_in_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  pB_in_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x5, x6)
U3_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
pD_in_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  pD_in_ggaag(x1, x2, x5)
U5_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_ggaag(x1, x2, x5, x6)
gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2)
gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)
U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
U6_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)
pD_out_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  pD_out_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
pB_out_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  pB_out_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)
U4_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10)  =  U4_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6, x7, x10)

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → U1_GG(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17))
SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U3_GGAAGGAA(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15))
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17) → PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15)
PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15) → U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_in_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17))
PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15) → GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(T9, T10, T16, T17)
GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → U2_GGAA(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_in_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45))
GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)
U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → U6_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_in_gg(T15, T17))
U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(T15, T17)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U4_GGAAGGAA(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17))
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

samefringeA_in_gg(nil, nil) → samefringeA_out_gg(nil, nil)
samefringeA_in_gg(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → U1_gg(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17))
pB_in_ggaaggaa(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U3_ggaaggaa(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15))
pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15) → U5_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_in_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17))
gopherC_in_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22) → gopherC_out_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22)
gopherC_in_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_in_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45))
U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_out_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)) → gopherC_out_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45)
U5_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → U6_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_in_gg(T15, T17))
U6_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_out_gg(T15, T17)) → pD_out_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15)
U3_ggaaggaa(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_out_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15)) → pB_out_ggaaggaa(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17)
pB_in_ggaaggaa(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U4_ggaaggaa(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17))
U4_ggaaggaa(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_out_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)) → pB_out_ggaaggaa(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)
U1_gg(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_out_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17)) → samefringeA_out_gg(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
samefringeA_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  samefringeA_in_gg(x1, x2)
nil  =  nil
samefringeA_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  samefringeA_out_gg(x1, x2)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
U1_gg(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_gg(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
pB_in_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  pB_in_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x5, x6)
U3_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
pD_in_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  pD_in_ggaag(x1, x2, x5)
U5_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_ggaag(x1, x2, x5, x6)
gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2)
gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)
U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
U6_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)
pD_out_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  pD_out_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
pB_out_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  pB_out_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)
U4_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10)  =  U4_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6, x7, x10)
SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(x1, x2)
U1_GG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_GG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x5, x6)
U3_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x6)
PD_IN_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  PD_IN_GGAAG(x1, x2, x5)
U5_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGAAG(x1, x2, x5, x6)
GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(x1, x2)
U2_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x6)
U6_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)
U4_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10)  =  U4_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x6, x7, x10)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(4) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → U1_GG(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17))
SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U3_GGAAGGAA(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15))
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17) → PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15)
PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15) → U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_in_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17))
PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15) → GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(T9, T10, T16, T17)
GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → U2_GGAA(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_in_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45))
GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)
U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → U6_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_in_gg(T15, T17))
U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(T15, T17)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U4_GGAAGGAA(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17))
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

samefringeA_in_gg(nil, nil) → samefringeA_out_gg(nil, nil)
samefringeA_in_gg(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → U1_gg(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17))
pB_in_ggaaggaa(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U3_ggaaggaa(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15))
pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15) → U5_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_in_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17))
gopherC_in_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22) → gopherC_out_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22)
gopherC_in_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_in_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45))
U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_out_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)) → gopherC_out_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45)
U5_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → U6_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_in_gg(T15, T17))
U6_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_out_gg(T15, T17)) → pD_out_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15)
U3_ggaaggaa(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_out_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15)) → pB_out_ggaaggaa(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17)
pB_in_ggaaggaa(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U4_ggaaggaa(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17))
U4_ggaaggaa(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_out_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)) → pB_out_ggaaggaa(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)
U1_gg(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_out_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17)) → samefringeA_out_gg(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
samefringeA_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  samefringeA_in_gg(x1, x2)
nil  =  nil
samefringeA_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  samefringeA_out_gg(x1, x2)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
U1_gg(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_gg(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
pB_in_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  pB_in_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x5, x6)
U3_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
pD_in_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  pD_in_ggaag(x1, x2, x5)
U5_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_ggaag(x1, x2, x5, x6)
gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2)
gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)
U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
U6_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)
pD_out_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  pD_out_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
pB_out_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  pB_out_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)
U4_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10)  =  U4_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6, x7, x10)
SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(x1, x2)
U1_GG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_GG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x5, x6)
U3_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x6)
PD_IN_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  PD_IN_GGAAG(x1, x2, x5)
U5_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGAAG(x1, x2, x5, x6)
GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(x1, x2)
U2_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x6)
U6_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)
U4_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10)  =  U4_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x6, x7, x10)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 2 SCCs with 6 less nodes.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

samefringeA_in_gg(nil, nil) → samefringeA_out_gg(nil, nil)
samefringeA_in_gg(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → U1_gg(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17))
pB_in_ggaaggaa(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U3_ggaaggaa(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15))
pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15) → U5_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_in_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17))
gopherC_in_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22) → gopherC_out_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22)
gopherC_in_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_in_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45))
U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_out_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)) → gopherC_out_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45)
U5_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → U6_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_in_gg(T15, T17))
U6_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_out_gg(T15, T17)) → pD_out_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15)
U3_ggaaggaa(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_out_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15)) → pB_out_ggaaggaa(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17)
pB_in_ggaaggaa(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U4_ggaaggaa(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17))
U4_ggaaggaa(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_out_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)) → pB_out_ggaaggaa(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)
U1_gg(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_out_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17)) → samefringeA_out_gg(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
samefringeA_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  samefringeA_in_gg(x1, x2)
nil  =  nil
samefringeA_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  samefringeA_out_gg(x1, x2)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
U1_gg(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_gg(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
pB_in_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  pB_in_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x5, x6)
U3_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
pD_in_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  pD_in_ggaag(x1, x2, x5)
U5_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_ggaag(x1, x2, x5, x6)
gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2)
gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)
U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
U6_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)
pD_out_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  pD_out_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
pB_out_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  pB_out_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)
U4_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10)  =  U4_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6, x7, x10)
GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(8) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(9) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)

R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(10) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(cons(T29, T30), T31) → GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(T29, cons(T30, T31))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(cons(T29, T30), T31) → GOPHERC_IN_GGAA(T29, cons(T30, T31))
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(13) YES

(14) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17) → PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15)
PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15) → U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_in_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17))
U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(T15, T17)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

samefringeA_in_gg(nil, nil) → samefringeA_out_gg(nil, nil)
samefringeA_in_gg(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → U1_gg(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17))
pB_in_ggaaggaa(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U3_ggaaggaa(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15))
pD_in_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15) → U5_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_in_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17))
gopherC_in_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22) → gopherC_out_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22)
gopherC_in_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_in_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45))
U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_out_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)) → gopherC_out_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45)
U5_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → U6_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_in_gg(T15, T17))
U6_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, samefringeA_out_gg(T15, T17)) → pD_out_ggaag(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15)
U3_ggaaggaa(T15, T9, T10, X16, X17, pD_out_ggaag(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15)) → pB_out_ggaaggaa(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17)
pB_in_ggaaggaa(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17) → U4_ggaaggaa(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_in_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17))
U4_ggaaggaa(T38, T39, T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17, pB_out_ggaaggaa(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)) → pB_out_ggaaggaa(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)
U1_gg(T7, T8, T9, T10, pB_out_ggaaggaa(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17)) → samefringeA_out_gg(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
samefringeA_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  samefringeA_in_gg(x1, x2)
nil  =  nil
samefringeA_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  samefringeA_out_gg(x1, x2)
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
U1_gg(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_gg(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
pB_in_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  pB_in_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x5, x6)
U3_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
pD_in_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  pD_in_ggaag(x1, x2, x5)
U5_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_ggaag(x1, x2, x5, x6)
gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2)
gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)
U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
U6_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)
pD_out_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  pD_out_ggaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
pB_out_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  pB_out_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)
U4_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10)  =  U4_ggaaggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6, x7, x10)
SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(x1, x2)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x5, x6)
PD_IN_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  PD_IN_GGAAG(x1, x2, x5)
U5_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGAAG(x1, x2, x5, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(15) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(16) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T7, T8, X14, X15, T9, T10, X16, X17)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(nil, T15, nil, T15, T9, T10, X16, X17) → PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, X16, X17, T15)
PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15) → U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_in_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17))
U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T16, T17, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(T15, T17)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T38, cons(T39, T40), X62, X63, T9, T10, X16, X17)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gopherC_in_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22) → gopherC_out_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22)
gopherC_in_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45) → U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_in_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45))
U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, X44, X45, gopherC_out_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)) → gopherC_out_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
nil  =  nil
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons(x1, x2)
gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2)
gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)
U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x6)
SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(x1, x2)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x5, x6)
PD_IN_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  PD_IN_GGAAG(x1, x2, x5)
U5_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGAAG(x1, x2, x5, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(17) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T7, T8, T9, T10)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(nil, T15, T9, T10) → PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, T15)
PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, T15) → U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T15, gopherC_in_ggaa(T9, T10))
U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(T15, T17)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, T9, T10) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T38, cons(T39, T40), T9, T10)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gopherC_in_ggaa(nil, T22) → gopherC_out_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22)
gopherC_in_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31) → U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, gopherC_in_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31)))
U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, gopherC_out_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)) → gopherC_out_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

gopherC_in_ggaa(x0, x1)
U2_ggaa(x0, x1, x2, x3)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(cons(T7, T8), cons(T9, T10)) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T7, T8, T9, T10)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = x1 + x2   
POL(PD_IN_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3)) = x3   
POL(SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(x1, x2)) = x1   
POL(U2_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = 0   
POL(U5_GGAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = x3   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   
POL(gopherC_in_ggaa(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(gopherC_out_ggaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = 0   
POL(nil) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:
none

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(nil, T15, T9, T10) → PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, T15)
PD_IN_GGAAG(T9, T10, T15) → U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T15, gopherC_in_ggaa(T9, T10))
U5_GGAAG(T9, T10, T15, gopherC_out_ggaa(T9, T10, T16, T17)) → SAMEFRINGEA_IN_GG(T15, T17)
PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, T9, T10) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T38, cons(T39, T40), T9, T10)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gopherC_in_ggaa(nil, T22) → gopherC_out_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22)
gopherC_in_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31) → U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, gopherC_in_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31)))
U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, gopherC_out_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)) → gopherC_out_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

gopherC_in_ggaa(x0, x1)
U2_ggaa(x0, x1, x2, x3)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, T9, T10) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T38, cons(T39, T40), T9, T10)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gopherC_in_ggaa(nil, T22) → gopherC_out_ggaa(nil, T22, nil, T22)
gopherC_in_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31) → U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, gopherC_in_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31)))
U2_ggaa(T29, T30, T31, gopherC_out_ggaa(T29, cons(T30, T31), X44, X45)) → gopherC_out_ggaa(cons(T29, T30), T31, X44, X45)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

gopherC_in_ggaa(x0, x1)
U2_ggaa(x0, x1, x2, x3)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(24) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, T9, T10) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T38, cons(T39, T40), T9, T10)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

gopherC_in_ggaa(x0, x1)
U2_ggaa(x0, x1, x2, x3)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(25) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

gopherC_in_ggaa(x0, x1)
U2_ggaa(x0, x1, x2, x3)

(26) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, T9, T10) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T38, cons(T39, T40), T9, T10)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(27) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(cons(T38, T39), T40, T9, T10) → PB_IN_GGAAGGAA(T38, cons(T39, T40), T9, T10)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 3 >= 3, 4 >= 4

(28) YES