(0) Obligation:
Clauses:
fold(X, [], Z) :- ','(!, eq(X, Z)).
fold(X, Y, Z) :- ','(head(Y, H), ','(tail(Y, T), ','(myop(X, H, V), fold(V, T, Z)))).
myop(a, b, a).
head([], X1).
head(.(H, X2), H).
tail([], []).
tail(.(X3, T), T).
eq(X, X).
Query: fold(g,g,a)
(1) PrologToPiTRSViaGraphTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)
Transformed Prolog program to (Pi-)TRS.
(2) Obligation:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
foldA_in_gga(T11, [], T11) → foldA_out_gga(T11, [], T11)
foldA_in_gga(a, .(b, T32), T18) → U1_gga(T32, T18, foldB_in_ga(T32, T18))
foldB_in_ga([], a) → foldB_out_ga([], a)
foldB_in_ga(.(b, T62), T47) → U2_ga(T62, T47, foldB_in_ga(T62, T47))
U2_ga(T62, T47, foldB_out_ga(T62, T47)) → foldB_out_ga(.(b, T62), T47)
U1_gga(T32, T18, foldB_out_ga(T32, T18)) → foldA_out_gga(a, .(b, T32), T18)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
foldA_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
foldA_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
[] =
[]
foldA_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
foldA_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
a =
a
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
b =
b
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U1_gga(
x1,
x3)
foldB_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
foldB_in_ga(
x1)
foldB_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
foldB_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U2_ga(
x1,
x3)
(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FOLDA_IN_GGA(a, .(b, T32), T18) → U1_GGA(T32, T18, foldB_in_ga(T32, T18))
FOLDA_IN_GGA(a, .(b, T32), T18) → FOLDB_IN_GA(T32, T18)
FOLDB_IN_GA(.(b, T62), T47) → U2_GA(T62, T47, foldB_in_ga(T62, T47))
FOLDB_IN_GA(.(b, T62), T47) → FOLDB_IN_GA(T62, T47)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
foldA_in_gga(T11, [], T11) → foldA_out_gga(T11, [], T11)
foldA_in_gga(a, .(b, T32), T18) → U1_gga(T32, T18, foldB_in_ga(T32, T18))
foldB_in_ga([], a) → foldB_out_ga([], a)
foldB_in_ga(.(b, T62), T47) → U2_ga(T62, T47, foldB_in_ga(T62, T47))
U2_ga(T62, T47, foldB_out_ga(T62, T47)) → foldB_out_ga(.(b, T62), T47)
U1_gga(T32, T18, foldB_out_ga(T32, T18)) → foldA_out_gga(a, .(b, T32), T18)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
foldA_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
foldA_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
[] =
[]
foldA_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
foldA_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
a =
a
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
b =
b
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U1_gga(
x1,
x3)
foldB_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
foldB_in_ga(
x1)
foldB_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
foldB_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U2_ga(
x1,
x3)
FOLDA_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
FOLDA_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
U1_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U1_GGA(
x1,
x3)
FOLDB_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
FOLDB_IN_GA(
x1)
U2_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U2_GA(
x1,
x3)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(4) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FOLDA_IN_GGA(a, .(b, T32), T18) → U1_GGA(T32, T18, foldB_in_ga(T32, T18))
FOLDA_IN_GGA(a, .(b, T32), T18) → FOLDB_IN_GA(T32, T18)
FOLDB_IN_GA(.(b, T62), T47) → U2_GA(T62, T47, foldB_in_ga(T62, T47))
FOLDB_IN_GA(.(b, T62), T47) → FOLDB_IN_GA(T62, T47)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
foldA_in_gga(T11, [], T11) → foldA_out_gga(T11, [], T11)
foldA_in_gga(a, .(b, T32), T18) → U1_gga(T32, T18, foldB_in_ga(T32, T18))
foldB_in_ga([], a) → foldB_out_ga([], a)
foldB_in_ga(.(b, T62), T47) → U2_ga(T62, T47, foldB_in_ga(T62, T47))
U2_ga(T62, T47, foldB_out_ga(T62, T47)) → foldB_out_ga(.(b, T62), T47)
U1_gga(T32, T18, foldB_out_ga(T32, T18)) → foldA_out_gga(a, .(b, T32), T18)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
foldA_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
foldA_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
[] =
[]
foldA_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
foldA_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
a =
a
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
b =
b
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U1_gga(
x1,
x3)
foldB_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
foldB_in_ga(
x1)
foldB_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
foldB_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U2_ga(
x1,
x3)
FOLDA_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
FOLDA_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
U1_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U1_GGA(
x1,
x3)
FOLDB_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
FOLDB_IN_GA(
x1)
U2_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U2_GA(
x1,
x3)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.
(6) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FOLDB_IN_GA(.(b, T62), T47) → FOLDB_IN_GA(T62, T47)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
foldA_in_gga(T11, [], T11) → foldA_out_gga(T11, [], T11)
foldA_in_gga(a, .(b, T32), T18) → U1_gga(T32, T18, foldB_in_ga(T32, T18))
foldB_in_ga([], a) → foldB_out_ga([], a)
foldB_in_ga(.(b, T62), T47) → U2_ga(T62, T47, foldB_in_ga(T62, T47))
U2_ga(T62, T47, foldB_out_ga(T62, T47)) → foldB_out_ga(.(b, T62), T47)
U1_gga(T32, T18, foldB_out_ga(T32, T18)) → foldA_out_gga(a, .(b, T32), T18)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
foldA_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
foldA_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
[] =
[]
foldA_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
foldA_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
a =
a
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
b =
b
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U1_gga(
x1,
x3)
foldB_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
foldB_in_ga(
x1)
foldB_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
foldB_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
U2_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U2_ga(
x1,
x3)
FOLDB_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
FOLDB_IN_GA(
x1)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(7) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.
(8) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FOLDB_IN_GA(.(b, T62), T47) → FOLDB_IN_GA(T62, T47)
R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
b =
b
FOLDB_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
FOLDB_IN_GA(
x1)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(9) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.
(10) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FOLDB_IN_GA(.(b, T62)) → FOLDB_IN_GA(T62)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
(11) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- FOLDB_IN_GA(.(b, T62)) → FOLDB_IN_GA(T62)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
(12) YES