(0) Obligation:
Clauses:
member(X, .(Y, Xs)) :- member(X, Xs).
member(X, .(X, Xs)).
Query: member(a,g)
(1) LPReorderTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Reordered facts before rules in definite LP [PROLOG].
(2) Obligation:
Clauses:
member(X, .(X, Xs)).
member(X, .(Y, Xs)) :- member(X, Xs).
Query: member(a,g)
(3) PrologToCdtProblemTransformerProof (UPPER BOUND (ID) transformation)
Built complexity over-approximating cdt problems from derivation graph.
(4) Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:
f2_in(.(z0, z1)) → f2_out1(z0)
f2_in(.(z0, z1)) → U1(f2_in(z1), .(z0, z1))
f2_in(.(z0, z1)) → U2(f2_in(z1), .(z0, z1))
U1(f2_out1(z0), .(z1, z2)) → f2_out1(z0)
U2(f2_out1(z0), .(z1, z2)) → f2_out1(z0)
Tuples:
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c1(U1'(f2_in(z1), .(z0, z1)), F2_IN(z1))
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c2(U2'(f2_in(z1), .(z0, z1)), F2_IN(z1))
S tuples:
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c1(U1'(f2_in(z1), .(z0, z1)), F2_IN(z1))
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c2(U2'(f2_in(z1), .(z0, z1)), F2_IN(z1))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:
f2_in, U1, U2
Defined Pair Symbols:
F2_IN
Compound Symbols:
c1, c2
(5) CdtGraphRemoveTrailingTuplepartsProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)
Removed 2 trailing tuple parts
(6) Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:
f2_in(.(z0, z1)) → f2_out1(z0)
f2_in(.(z0, z1)) → U1(f2_in(z1), .(z0, z1))
f2_in(.(z0, z1)) → U2(f2_in(z1), .(z0, z1))
U1(f2_out1(z0), .(z1, z2)) → f2_out1(z0)
U2(f2_out1(z0), .(z1, z2)) → f2_out1(z0)
Tuples:
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c1(F2_IN(z1))
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c2(F2_IN(z1))
S tuples:
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c1(F2_IN(z1))
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c2(F2_IN(z1))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:
f2_in, U1, U2
Defined Pair Symbols:
F2_IN
Compound Symbols:
c1, c2
(7) CdtPolyRedPairProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^1))) transformation)
Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c1(F2_IN(z1))
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c2(F2_IN(z1))
We considered the (Usable) Rules:none
And the Tuples:
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c1(F2_IN(z1))
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c2(F2_IN(z1))
The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation :
POL(.(x1, x2)) = [2] + x2
POL(F2_IN(x1)) = x1
POL(c1(x1)) = x1
POL(c2(x1)) = x1
(8) Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:
f2_in(.(z0, z1)) → f2_out1(z0)
f2_in(.(z0, z1)) → U1(f2_in(z1), .(z0, z1))
f2_in(.(z0, z1)) → U2(f2_in(z1), .(z0, z1))
U1(f2_out1(z0), .(z1, z2)) → f2_out1(z0)
U2(f2_out1(z0), .(z1, z2)) → f2_out1(z0)
Tuples:
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c1(F2_IN(z1))
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c2(F2_IN(z1))
S tuples:none
K tuples:
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c1(F2_IN(z1))
F2_IN(.(z0, z1)) → c2(F2_IN(z1))
Defined Rule Symbols:
f2_in, U1, U2
Defined Pair Symbols:
F2_IN
Compound Symbols:
c1, c2
(9) SIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The set S is empty
(10) BOUNDS(O(1), O(1))
(11) PrologToCdtProblemTransformerProof (UPPER BOUND (ID) transformation)
Built complexity over-approximating cdt problems from derivation graph.
(12) Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:
f1_in(.(z0, z1)) → f1_out1(z0)
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → f1_out1(z1)
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U1(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U2(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U3(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U4(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
U1(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
U2(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
U3(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
U4(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
Tuples:
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c2(U1'(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2))), F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c3(U2'(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2))), F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c4(U3'(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2))), F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c5(U4'(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2))), F1_IN(z2))
S tuples:
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c2(U1'(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2))), F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c3(U2'(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2))), F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c4(U3'(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2))), F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c5(U4'(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2))), F1_IN(z2))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:
f1_in, U1, U2, U3, U4
Defined Pair Symbols:
F1_IN
Compound Symbols:
c2, c3, c4, c5
(13) CdtGraphRemoveTrailingTuplepartsProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)
Removed 4 trailing tuple parts
(14) Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:
f1_in(.(z0, z1)) → f1_out1(z0)
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → f1_out1(z1)
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U1(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U2(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U3(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U4(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
U1(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
U2(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
U3(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
U4(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
Tuples:
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c2(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c3(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c4(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c5(F1_IN(z2))
S tuples:
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c2(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c3(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c4(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c5(F1_IN(z2))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:
f1_in, U1, U2, U3, U4
Defined Pair Symbols:
F1_IN
Compound Symbols:
c2, c3, c4, c5
(15) CdtPolyRedPairProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^1))) transformation)
Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c2(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c3(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c4(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c5(F1_IN(z2))
We considered the (Usable) Rules:none
And the Tuples:
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c2(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c3(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c4(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c5(F1_IN(z2))
The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation :
POL(.(x1, x2)) = [1] + x2
POL(F1_IN(x1)) = x1
POL(c2(x1)) = x1
POL(c3(x1)) = x1
POL(c4(x1)) = x1
POL(c5(x1)) = x1
(16) Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:
f1_in(.(z0, z1)) → f1_out1(z0)
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → f1_out1(z1)
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U1(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U2(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U3(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
f1_in(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → U4(f1_in(z2), .(z0, .(z1, z2)))
U1(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
U2(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
U3(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
U4(f1_out1(z0), .(z1, .(z2, z3))) → f1_out1(z0)
Tuples:
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c2(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c3(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c4(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c5(F1_IN(z2))
S tuples:none
K tuples:
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c2(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c3(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c4(F1_IN(z2))
F1_IN(.(z0, .(z1, z2))) → c5(F1_IN(z2))
Defined Rule Symbols:
f1_in, U1, U2, U3, U4
Defined Pair Symbols:
F1_IN
Compound Symbols:
c2, c3, c4, c5