Meaning of the annotations for the proof of each method:
- loop: the method seems to be part of a loop or recursion
- inherits: the method seems to call a method that possibly diverges
- may_diverge: proved the existence of at least a diverging execution
- local_polyh: proved to terminate by using a local linear ranking function for the binary unfolding with polyhedra
- local_bds: proved to terminate by using local linear ranking functions for the binary unfolding with bounded difference shapes
- local_sct: proved to terminate via the size change termination principle with monotonicity constraints
- global_lex_aff_rnkfn: proved to terminate by using a global lexicographic affine ranking function
- finite_unfoldings: proved to terminate since there is a finite number of undoldings
* numerical: the ranking function uses numerical variables or fields
* structural: the ranking function uses reference variables or fields
These methods do not introduce divergence:
MyString.():void
Distances.max(int,int):int
Distances.min(int,int):int
MyString.charAt(int):char
MyString.length():int
MyString.():void
[loop,numerical,structural,local_polyh] Distances.main(java.lang.String[]):void
Distances.min(int,int,int):int
[loop,numerical,structural,local_sct,local_bds]Distances.jaro(MyString,MyString):int
[loop,numerical,structural,local_bds,local_sct]Distances.levenshtein(MyString,MyString):int
[loop,numerical,structural,local_bds] Distances.findMatch(MyString,boolean[]):MyString
[loop,numerical,structural,local_bds] MyString.(int,int):void
[loop,numerical,structural,local_bds] MyString.append(char):void
[loop,numerical,structural,local_bds] Distances.hamming(MyString,MyString):int
There is at least a diverging computation for these methods:
none
Nothing is known about these methods:
none
Methods that might introduce divergence: 0/14 ( 0.00%)
Methods that do might introduce or inherit divergence: 0/14 ( 0.00%)
Methods that definitely terminate: 14/14 (100.00%)
There are no warnings