Termination Proof using AProVE

Term Rewriting System R:
[N, X, Y, Z]
terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N)))
sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
dbl(0) -> 0
dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X)))
add(0, X) -> X
add(s(X), Y) -> s(add(X, Y))
first(0, X) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, first(X, Z))
half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(X))) -> s(half(X))
half(dbl(X)) -> X

Termination of R to be shown.

     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

TERMS(N) -> SQR(N)
TERMS(N) -> TERMS(s(N))
SQR(s(X)) -> ADD(sqr(X), dbl(X))
SQR(s(X)) -> SQR(X)
SQR(s(X)) -> DBL(X)
DBL(s(X)) -> DBL(X)
ADD(s(X), Y) -> ADD(X, Y)
FIRST(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> FIRST(X, Z)
HALF(s(s(X))) -> HALF(X)

Furthermore, R contains six SCCs.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳Size-Change Principle

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳MRR

Dependency Pair:

ADD(s(X), Y) -> ADD(X, Y)

Rules:

terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N)))
sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
dbl(0) -> 0
dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X)))
add(0, X) -> X
add(s(X), Y) -> s(add(X, Y))
first(0, X) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, first(X, Z))
half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(X))) -> s(half(X))
half(dbl(X)) -> X

We number the DPs as follows:

ADD(s(X), Y) -> ADD(X, Y)

and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1
2	=	2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1
2	=	2

D_P: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.

trivial

with Argument Filtering System:

s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

We obtain no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳Size-Change Principle

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳MRR

Dependency Pair:

DBL(s(X)) -> DBL(X)

Rules:

terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N)))
sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
dbl(0) -> 0
dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X)))
add(0, X) -> X
add(s(X), Y) -> s(add(X, Y))
first(0, X) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, first(X, Z))
half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(X))) -> s(half(X))
half(dbl(X)) -> X

We number the DPs as follows:

DBL(s(X)) -> DBL(X)

and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1

D_P: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.

trivial

with Argument Filtering System:

s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

We obtain no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳Size-Change Principle

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳MRR

Dependency Pair:

FIRST(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> FIRST(X, Z)

Rules:

terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N)))
sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
dbl(0) -> 0
dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X)))
add(0, X) -> X
add(s(X), Y) -> s(add(X, Y))
first(0, X) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, first(X, Z))
half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(X))) -> s(half(X))
half(dbl(X)) -> X

We number the DPs as follows:

FIRST(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> FIRST(X, Z)

and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1
2	>	2

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1
2	>	2

D_P: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.

trivial

with Argument Filtering System:

cons(x₁, x₂) -> cons(x₁, x₂)
s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

We obtain no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳Size-Change Principle

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳MRR

Dependency Pair:

HALF(s(s(X))) -> HALF(X)

Rules:

terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N)))
sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
dbl(0) -> 0
dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X)))
add(0, X) -> X
add(s(X), Y) -> s(add(X, Y))
first(0, X) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, first(X, Z))
half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(X))) -> s(half(X))
half(dbl(X)) -> X

We number the DPs as follows:

HALF(s(s(X))) -> HALF(X)

and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1

D_P: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.

trivial

with Argument Filtering System:

s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

We obtain no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳Size-Change Principle

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳MRR

Dependency Pair:

SQR(s(X)) -> SQR(X)

Rules:

terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N)))
sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
dbl(0) -> 0
dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X)))
add(0, X) -> X
add(s(X), Y) -> s(add(X, Y))
first(0, X) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, first(X, Z))
half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(X))) -> s(half(X))
half(dbl(X)) -> X

We number the DPs as follows:

SQR(s(X)) -> SQR(X)

and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):

{1}	,	{1}
1	>	1

D_P: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.

trivial

with Argument Filtering System:

s(x₁) -> s(x₁)

We obtain no new DP problems.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳Modular Removal of Rules

Dependency Pair:

TERMS(N) -> TERMS(s(N))

Rules:

terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N)))
sqr(0) -> 0
sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
dbl(0) -> 0
dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X)))
add(0, X) -> X
add(s(X), Y) -> s(add(X, Y))
first(0, X) -> nil
first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, first(X, Z))
half(0) -> 0
half(s(0)) -> 0
half(s(s(X))) -> s(half(X))
half(dbl(X)) -> X

We have the following set of usable rules: none
To remove rules and DPs from this DP problem we used the following monotonic and C_E-compatible order: Polynomial ordering.
Polynomial interpretation:

POL(TERMS(x₁)) = x₁

POL(s(x₁)) = x₁

We have the following set D of usable symbols: {TERMS, s}
No Dependency Pairs can be deleted.
13 non usable rules have been deleted.

The result of this processor delivers one new DP problem.

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳MRR

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳Non-Overlappingness Check

Dependency Pair:

TERMS(N) -> TERMS(s(N))

Rule:

none

R does not overlap into P. Moreover, R is locally confluent (all critical pairs are trivially joinable).Hence we can switch to innermost.
The transformation is resulting in one subcycle:

     ↳DPs

       →DP Problem 1

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 2

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 3

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 4

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 5

         ↳SCP

       →DP Problem 6

         ↳MRR

           →DP Problem 7

             ↳NOC

...

               →DP Problem 8

                 ↳Non Termination

Dependency Pair:

TERMS(N) -> TERMS(s(N))

Rule:

none

Strategy:

innermost

Found an infinite P-chain over R:
P =

TERMS(N) -> TERMS(s(N))

R = none

s = TERMS(N)
evaluates to t =TERMS(s(N))

Thus, s starts an infinite chain as s matches t.

Non-Termination of R could be shown.
Duration:
0:02 minutes