Term Rewriting System R:
[X, XS, N]
from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X)))
after(0, XS) -> XS
after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS)

Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

FROM(X) -> FROM(s(X))
AFTER(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> AFTER(N, XS)

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:

FROM(X) -> FROM(s(X))


Rules:


from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X)))
after(0, XS) -> XS
after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS)





On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

FROM(X) -> FROM(s(X))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

FROM(s(X'')) -> FROM(s(s(X'')))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Inst
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:

FROM(s(X'')) -> FROM(s(s(X'')))


Rules:


from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X)))
after(0, XS) -> XS
after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS)





On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

FROM(s(X'')) -> FROM(s(s(X'')))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

FROM(s(s(X''''))) -> FROM(s(s(s(X''''))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Inst
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳Inst
             ...
               →DP Problem 4
                 ↳Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:

FROM(s(s(X''''))) -> FROM(s(s(s(X''''))))


Rules:


from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X)))
after(0, XS) -> XS
after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS)





On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

FROM(s(s(X''''))) -> FROM(s(s(s(X''''))))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

FROM(s(s(s(X'''''')))) -> FROM(s(s(s(s(X'''''')))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Inst
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳Inst
             ...
               →DP Problem 5
                 ↳Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:

FROM(s(s(s(X'''''')))) -> FROM(s(s(s(s(X'''''')))))


Rules:


from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X)))
after(0, XS) -> XS
after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS)





On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

FROM(s(s(s(X'''''')))) -> FROM(s(s(s(s(X'''''')))))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

FROM(s(s(s(s(X''''''''))))) -> FROM(s(s(s(s(s(X''''''''))))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Inst
           →DP Problem 3
             ↳Inst
             ...
               →DP Problem 6
                 ↳Instantiation Transformation
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:

FROM(s(s(s(s(X''''''''))))) -> FROM(s(s(s(s(s(X''''''''))))))


Rules:


from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X)))
after(0, XS) -> XS
after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> after(N, XS)





On this DP problem, an Instantiation SCC transformation can be performed.
As a result of transforming the rule

FROM(s(s(s(s(X''''''''))))) -> FROM(s(s(s(s(s(X''''''''))))))
one new Dependency Pair is created:

FROM(s(s(s(s(s(X'''''''''')))))) -> FROM(s(s(s(s(s(s(X'''''''''')))))))

The transformation is resulting in one new DP problem: 



   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Inst
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)




The following remains to be proven:


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Inst
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)




The following remains to be proven:

Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes