Term Rewriting System R:
[y, x]
le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(0, x) -> 0
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, x, y) -> gcd(minus(x, y), y)
ifgcd(false, x, y) -> gcd(minus(y, x), x)

Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)
MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)
GCD(s(x), s(y)) -> IFGCD(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
GCD(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(y, x)
IFGCD(true, x, y) -> GCD(minus(x, y), y)
IFGCD(true, x, y) -> MINUS(x, y)
IFGCD(false, x, y) -> GCD(minus(y, x), x)
IFGCD(false, x, y) -> MINUS(y, x)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Remaining`

Dependency Pair:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(0, x) -> 0
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, x, y) -> gcd(minus(x, y), y)
ifgcd(false, x, y) -> gcd(minus(y, x), x)

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

LE(s(x), s(y)) -> LE(x, y)

The following rules can be oriented:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(0, x) -> 0
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, x, y) -> gcd(minus(x, y), y)
ifgcd(false, x, y) -> gcd(minus(y, x), x)

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(if_gcd(x1, x2)) =  x1 + x2 POL(LE(x1, x2)) =  1 + x1 + x2 POL(0) =  0 POL(false) =  0 POL(true) =  0 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(le(x1, x2)) =  x1 + x2 POL(gcd(x1, x2)) =  x1 + x2

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
LE(x1, x2) -> LE(x1, x2)
s(x1) -> s(x1)
le(x1, x2) -> le(x1, x2)
minus(x1, x2) -> x1
gcd(x1, x2) -> gcd(x1, x2)
ifgcd(x1, x2, x3) -> ifgcd(x2, x3)

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Remaining`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(0, x) -> 0
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, x, y) -> gcd(minus(x, y), y)
ifgcd(false, x, y) -> gcd(minus(y, x), x)

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Argument Filtering and Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Remaining`

Dependency Pair:

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(0, x) -> 0
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, x, y) -> gcd(minus(x, y), y)
ifgcd(false, x, y) -> gcd(minus(y, x), x)

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

MINUS(s(x), s(y)) -> MINUS(x, y)

The following rules can be oriented:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(0, x) -> 0
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, x, y) -> gcd(minus(x, y), y)
ifgcd(false, x, y) -> gcd(minus(y, x), x)

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(if_gcd(x1, x2)) =  x1 + x2 POL(0) =  0 POL(false) =  0 POL(MINUS(x1, x2)) =  1 + x1 + x2 POL(true) =  0 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(le(x1, x2)) =  x1 + x2 POL(gcd(x1, x2)) =  x1 + x2

resulting in one new DP problem.
Used Argument Filtering System:
MINUS(x1, x2) -> MINUS(x1, x2)
s(x1) -> s(x1)
le(x1, x2) -> le(x1, x2)
minus(x1, x2) -> x1
gcd(x1, x2) -> gcd(x1, x2)
ifgcd(x1, x2, x3) -> ifgcd(x2, x3)

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳AFS`
`           →DP Problem 5`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Remaining`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(0, x) -> 0
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, x, y) -> gcd(minus(x, y), y)
ifgcd(false, x, y) -> gcd(minus(y, x), x)

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳AFS`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)`

The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pairs:

IFGCD(false, x, y) -> GCD(minus(y, x), x)
IFGCD(true, x, y) -> GCD(minus(x, y), y)
GCD(s(x), s(y)) -> IFGCD(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))

Rules:

le(0, y) -> true
le(s(x), 0) -> false
le(s(x), s(y)) -> le(x, y)
minus(x, 0) -> x
minus(0, x) -> 0
minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
gcd(0, y) -> y
gcd(s(x), 0) -> s(x)
gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> ifgcd(le(y, x), s(x), s(y))
ifgcd(true, x, y) -> gcd(minus(x, y), y)
ifgcd(false, x, y) -> gcd(minus(y, x), x)

Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:06 minutes