Term Rewriting System R:
[x, y, z]
f(x, c(x), c(y)) -> f(y, y, f(y, x, y))
f(s(x), y, z) -> f(x, s(c(y)), c(z))
f(c(x), x, y) -> c(y)
g(x, y) -> x
g(x, y) -> y

Termination of R to be shown. 



   R
     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis



R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

F(x, c(x), c(y)) -> F(y, y, f(y, x, y))
F(x, c(x), c(y)) -> F(y, x, y)
F(s(x), y, z) -> F(x, s(c(y)), c(z))

Furthermore, R contains two SCCs. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳Size-Change Principle
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining


Dependency Pair:

F(s(x), y, z) -> F(x, s(c(y)), c(z))


Rules:


f(x, c(x), c(y)) -> f(y, y, f(y, x, y))
f(s(x), y, z) -> f(x, s(c(y)), c(z))
f(c(x), x, y) -> c(y)
g(x, y) -> x
g(x, y) -> y





We number the DPs as follows:
  1. F(s(x), y, z) -> F(x, s(c(y)), c(z))
and get the following Size-Change Graph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1

which lead(s) to this/these maximal multigraph(s):
{1} , {1}
1>1

DP: empty set
Oriented Rules: none

We used the order Homeomorphic Embedding Order with Non-Strict Precedence.
trivial

with Argument Filtering System:
c(x1) -> c(x1)
s(x1) -> s(x1)

We obtain no new DP problems. 


   R
     ↳DPs
       →DP Problem 1
         ↳SCP
       →DP Problem 2
         ↳Remaining Obligation(s)




The following remains to be proven:
Dependency Pairs:

F(x, c(x), c(y)) -> F(y, x, y)
F(x, c(x), c(y)) -> F(y, y, f(y, x, y))


Rules:


f(x, c(x), c(y)) -> f(y, y, f(y, x, y))
f(s(x), y, z) -> f(x, s(c(y)), c(z))
f(c(x), x, y) -> c(y)
g(x, y) -> x
g(x, y) -> y




Termination of R could not be shown.
Duration:
0:55 minutes