Term Rewriting System R:
[X, Z, N, Y]
from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(s(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(X)
activate(X) -> X

Termination of R to be shown.

`   R`
`     ↳Dependency Pair Analysis`

R contains the following Dependency Pairs:

2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> ACTIVATE(Z)
PI(X) -> 2NDSPOS(X, from(0))
PI(X) -> FROM(0)
PLUS(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(X, Y)
TIMES(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(Y, times(X, Y))
TIMES(s(X), Y) -> TIMES(X, Y)
SQUARE(X) -> TIMES(X, X)
ACTIVATE(nfrom(X)) -> FROM(X)

Furthermore, R contains three SCCs.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pairs:

2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))
2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(s(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(X)
activate(X) -> X

The following dependency pairs can be strictly oriented:

2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSPOS(N, activate(Z))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2NDSNEG(N, activate(Z))

There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(n__from(x1)) =  0 POL(from(x1)) =  0 POL(activate(x1)) =  0 POL(cons(x1, x2)) =  0 POL(2NDSNEG(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1 POL(cons2(x1, x2)) =  0 POL(2NDSPOS(x1, x2)) =  x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 4`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pairs:

2NDSNEG(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSNEG(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2NDSPOS(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2NDSPOS(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(s(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(X)
activate(X) -> X

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

PLUS(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(X, Y)

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(s(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(X)
activate(X) -> X

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

PLUS(s(X), Y) -> PLUS(X, Y)

There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(PLUS(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 5`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(s(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(X)
activate(X) -> X

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polynomial Ordering`

Dependency Pair:

TIMES(s(X), Y) -> TIMES(X, Y)

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(s(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(X)
activate(X) -> X

The following dependency pair can be strictly oriented:

TIMES(s(X), Y) -> TIMES(X, Y)

There are no usable rules w.r.t. to the implicit AFS that need to be oriented.

Used ordering: Polynomial ordering with Polynomial interpretation:
 POL(TIMES(x1, x2)) =  x1 POL(s(x1)) =  1 + x1

resulting in one new DP problem.

`   R`
`     ↳DPs`
`       →DP Problem 1`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 2`
`         ↳Polo`
`       →DP Problem 3`
`         ↳Polo`
`           →DP Problem 6`
`             ↳Dependency Graph`

Dependency Pair:

Rules:

from(X) -> cons(X, nfrom(s(X)))
from(X) -> nfrom(X)
2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil
2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z)))
2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z)))
pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0))
plus(0, Y) -> Y
plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y))
times(0, Y) -> 0
times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y))
square(X) -> times(X, X)
activate(nfrom(X)) -> from(X)
activate(X) -> X

Using the Dependency Graph resulted in no new DP problems.

Termination of R successfully shown.
Duration:
0:00 minutes